Search for: "In re Amend. to Admin. Order No. 19"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am
” (Id. at PAGEID # 517-19.) [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
See In re Credit Suisse, Securities Act Release No. 9589 (May 19, 2014). [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:59 pm
To do that, had to face fact that §19 wasn’t effective as a remedy—the money would be long gone after first admin procedure, then federal court enforcement procedure. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:13 pm
If the resident deems their property and situation unsafe, we would advise they contact any local authority of their choice for immediate temporary re-housing. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
Food and Drug Admin., Case No. 1:12-cv-01105-ABJ (D. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm
The most striking legal story of the week was the reporting of the Administrative Court’s ruling on Article 50 and the Royal Prerogative ([2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin)). [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 10:34 am
If the person is seeking admission or re-admission to the industry; and1. the person is subject to an order under Exchange Act Section 15(b)(4)(H)(i), then the person must file an application unless the order imposing a bar on the person is time-limited and the time period is expired. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:13 pm
Res. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 10:53 am
” Slip op. 18, 19-21. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:13 pm
& includes any failure to perform obligs. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/SanchezvNorthwestAir-8th-Bye-10-14-11.pdf … 8th reminds that per SCOTUS' Reading case, costs incident to bs. operation qualify for admin. priority under § 503(b). http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/SanchezvNorthwestAir-8th-Bye-10-14-11.pdf … SDNY: Mere possession of claimant's property w/out actual use by debtor isn't enough to… [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 11:11 am
It has two parts: the straightforward definition of “tracking device” in 3117(b), set out above, and the following venue provision in 3117(a): If a court is empowered to issue a warrant or other order for the installation of a mobile tracking device, such order may authorize the use of that device within the jurisdiction of the court, and outside of that jurisdiction if the device is installed in that jurisdiction. [5]In 2006, Congress approved Rule 41… [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
Terrorism off the agenda, for now In the courts: Secretary of State for the Home Department v BF [2011] EWHC 1878 (Admin) (18 July 2011) Control order of man accused of undertaking terrorist activities during trip to Pakistan was lawful. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Finally, courtesy of the Tenth Circuit, an admin-law decision with some real fireworks in it. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
Re AB: Termination of pregnancy. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:41 pm
JPM for pre-BK enhancement of position http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/Lehman-BK-SDNY-Peck-4-19-12.pdf … B-SDNY's Peck,J. in Lehman v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
COURT DOCKET Filings Title: V GRIFFEN VS STATE OF IOWA Case: 01071 LACV096157 (BLACK HAWK) Citation Number: Event Filed By Filed Create Date Last Updated Action Date OTHER ORDER STAUDT DAVID F 03/27/2012 03/28/2012 03/28/2012 Comments: APPROVING SETTLEMENT OTHER APPLICATION MOELLER JOANNE 03/27/2012 03/28/2012 03/28/2012 … [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 10:00 pm
http://lexne.ws/5ks by Scott Riddle 10th BAP reviews split re Ch 7 ttee's rts to $$ in Dbtr's bank acct on filing date & requires funds turnover by Dbtr. http://t.co/WX6jNny 10th BAP: §542(a) turnover req't applies if one holds estate prop. at any time during case; current psn. not required. http://t.co/WX6jNny D-IL: Ch 13 dbtr cant bring undisclosed action after BK case closed if it arose after BK filing & during admin of case.… [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am
(19 May 2013). [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 12:46 am
If prior to exit day an EUTM owner has consented to you doing something in the UK, the clone cannot be used to bring an infringement action (19). [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am
Smith & Ors, R. v (Rev 1) [2011] EWCA Crim 1772 (19 July 2011): Court of Appeal: Blanket internet bans for Sexual Offences Prevention Orders always disproportionate; court gives general guidance. [read post]
