Search for: "In re Amendment to Rule 1.4"
Results 1 - 20
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2018, 8:01 am
Amend, Restate or Execute a New Will? [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 7:33 am
We’re going back to court to defend their rights at the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals next week. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 8:27 am
But what the pension funds are telling minorities is that you're good enough to put your money into the pension fund systems, but you're not good enough to manage those assets. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:41 am
My Take I think it’s great that the current SEC is willing re-evaluate its rules and fix them to make them work better. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
Special rules apply where the employer is a partnership. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:19 pm
The Family Procedure Rules 2010 – not to be confused with the Family ProceedINGS Rules 1991 (as amended) – are now available for your delectation. [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:47 pm
AFP suggests that with the FCC's proposed steps, we're in for some radical change. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:01 pm
“We do want to be open and transparent with the public and not come across as if we’re trying to hide something because we’re not. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 11:28 am
(The rule expressly requires the latter.) [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 10:34 am
Walter Daniel, a former Coast Guard officer, has petitioned the Supreme Court to “amend the 1950 [Feres] ruling, creating an exception that would allow service members to sue for medical malpractice the same way civilians can,” KHN reported, noting this would affect patients in a military health system “with 54 hospitals and 377 medical clinics, serv[ing] about 9.4 million beneficiaries, including nearly 1.4 million active-duty members. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm
T 241/02 has stated that “the grant of a patent does not necessarily constitute a final and automatic cut-off point excluding any reinsertion of deleted subject-matter” (point 1.4 of the reasons) and that T 1149/97 did not lay down a strict rule (point 2.3.5 of the reasons). [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:40 pm
These two rules have been estimated to cost $17.8 billion annually and 1.4 million job-years by 2020. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:02 pm
In re Custodial Law Enforcement Recording, 266 N.C. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:44 am
But amended 13Fs, especially those that are amended due to the SEC’s Confidential Treatment rules, (this piece in the WSJ late last year provides a good primer) are a whole different story. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 10:38 am
Second, the proposed rule allows examiners to require applicants to make amendments to simplify the presentation of claims. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 3:38 pm
Supreme Court, which affirmed the ruling below. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:09 am
In this opposition appeal, both the proprietor and the opponent appealed the decision of the Opposition Division to maintain the patent in amended form. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:09 am
In this opposition appeal, both the proprietor and the opponent appealed the decision of the Opposition Division to maintain the patent in amended form. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 7:14 am
In re Countrywide Corp. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 11:00 pm
An amendment by Reps. [read post]
