Search for: "In re Answers Corp. Shareholders Litigation"
Results 61 - 80
of 115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2013, 5:00 pm
Sues Filmmakers of ‘Venus and Serena’ for copyright infringement http://t.co/mwSUKuZIpg -> The Chinese answer to The Social Network is a massive, pro-<b>copyright</b> <b>…</b> http://t.co/D2XOorgTtg -> Lanham Act case dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction in TRATON v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 11:20 am
This week, in an important decision that may reach the Delaware Supreme Court, In re MFW Shareholders Litigation, the Delaware Court of Chancery again affirmed the importance of special committees in those circumstances, and offered a road map to companies and controlling stockholders on how to structure going private transactions. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
In re Answers Corp. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm
The Court distinguished the decision of In Re 3COM Corp. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:33 am
Short Answer The Court of Chancery reasoned that collateral estoppel would not apply, and motions to dismiss based on Rule 23.1 and Rule 12(b)(6) were both denied. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:12 am
The answer depends on the facts and circumstances of the individual case, but there are some general principles that typically apply. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 7:31 pm
In Re El Paso Corporation Shareholder Litigation, Consol. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 2:16 pm
In In Re Celera Corporation Shareholder Litigation, C.A., No. 6304-VCP (Del. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:43 am
Issue: In In Re Answers Corp. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
Among the important questions that will need to be answered in connection with the current wave of failed bank litigation is the question of extent to which the non-director officers will be able to defend themselves in reliance on the business judgment rule. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 12:55 pm
” See In Re Southern Peru Copper Corp S’holder Deriv. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:55 am
Target boards are no longer subject to shareholder discipline because the acquirer will buy out the target’s shareholders. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:52 am
I think the answer is likely to be no. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Lauderdale Division.Civil procedure -- Default -- Vacation -- Excusable neglect -- In action for breach of contract, open account and unjust enrichment in which default had been entered for defendants' failure to file answer to original complaint, where trial court first granted defendants' motion for vacation of default judgment on grounds of lack of subject matter jurisdiction based on forum selection clause, then upon plantiff's motion for rehearing determined it did have… [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is In re Heckmann Corp. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:22 am
Shareholders Litigation, 789 A.2d. 14 (Del. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
The next day, with allegations Langford was “freezing” him out of StaxxRing, Adams answered the lawsuit; asserted affirmative defenses of fraud, unclean hands, and estoppel and quasi- estoppel; and counterclaimed against Langford for fraud, conversion, and shareholder oppression, requesting damages, exemplary damages, and attorney's fees. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:34 pm
Litig. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:00 am
Arbitrators are well situated to answer that question”) (citation omitted; emphasis in original); Southland Corp. v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:39 am
Shareholders Litigation and In re Answers Corp. [read post]
