Search for: "In re Answers Corp. Shareholders Litigation"
Results 81 - 100
of 115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm
Shareholders Litigation, 2004 WL 253521 (Del. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Corp. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:22 pm
P. 199.5(d) (allowing conferences during otherwise scheduled breaks); In re PSE&G Shareholder Litigation, 726 A.2d 994, 997 (N.J. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:28 am
Relying on In re Homebanc Corp. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:15 pm
The only other reported case addressing the same provision, In re Pharmaceutical Industry Average Wholesale Price Litigation, 478 F.Supp.2d 164 (D. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:18 am
Southland Corp. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:15 am
But at least in one case, the answer is "yes. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:34 am
The Second Circuit’s conclusion is consistent with the holding by the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit in In re Digimarc Corp. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 1:14 am
Plaintiffs lawyer Stuart Grant says the answer has too often been no, with courts denying shareholders the right to pursue malpractice claims against auditors. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 6:27 am
In Re CNX Gas Corp. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:18 pm
See McWane Cast Iron Pipe Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:33 pm
Perinni Corp., 37 F. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
It held that “the Corps was neither arbitrary nor capricious when rationally concluding the Stillwater site was the [least environmentally damaging practicable alternative],” and that the FWS’s biological opinion stated “a rational connection between the facts found and the conclusion reached. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
It held that “the Corps was neither arbitrary nor capricious when rationally concluding the Stillwater site was the [least environmentally damaging practicable alternative],” and that the FWS’s biological opinion stated “a rational connection between the facts found and the conclusion reached. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 4:36 am
Shareholder Derivative Litig., 964 A.2d 106, 122 (Del. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
A counterclaim for judicial dissolution in an existing litigation won't cut it. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:01 am
In what is one of the largest ever shareholders’ derivative lawsuit settlements, the parties to the consolidated federal options backdating related derivative lawsuit involving Broadcom Corp. have agreed to settle the case for $118 million, to be funded entirely by the company’s D&O insurance carriers. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
The answer is a clear yes. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
They are the question and the answer. [read post]
30 May 2009, 4:57 pm
In Re Schmitz, No. 07-0581, 2009 WL 1427184 (Tex.), 52 Tex. [read post]
