Search for: "In re Antonio C. (2000)" Results 1 - 20 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2013, 1:29 pm by MOTP
-San Antonio 2000, orig. proceeding) ("Since the parties surrendered their rights to trial by jury, these mutual promises supply valid consideration. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 1:29 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
-San Antonio 2000, orig. proceeding) ("Since the parties surrendered their rights to trial by jury, these mutual promises supply valid consideration."). [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 1:29 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
-San Antonio 2000, orig. proceeding) ("Since the parties surrendered their rights to trial by jury, these mutual promises supply valid consideration."). [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 3:34 pm
— San Antonio January 16, 2008), released for publication May 23, 2008, pdr refused In re Thomas, 2008 Tex. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm by Josh Blackman
  The majority of those judges live elsewhere, in places like Austin, San Antonio, and El Paso—hundreds of miles away from Midland. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
 In In re Mark C., supra, 244 Cal.App.4th 520, Division Two followed its earlier decision in In re Erica R., supra, 240 Cal.App.4th 907&n [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:23 am
The opinion begins by explaining thatSteven Nachbar pleaded guilty to one count of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor more than three years younger (California Penal Code § 261.5(c)). [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:07 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
In San Antonio, the Chief’s Advisory Action Board has the ability to interview officers before making a recommendation for disciplinary action to the chief. [read post]