Search for: "In re Apple Processor Litigation"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
” This is a beautiful test if you’re a plaintiff’s attorney, particularly if you’re Apple’s attorneys. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:18 pm
The products at issue pertaining to the RE ‘911 patent include digital image capture devices containing two or more image processors that alter image processing (such as white balance, color, sharpness, resolution,) within the digital image capture device. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 8:03 am
At the moment, Apple reduces that commission only by 3% for Dutch dating apps--which barely offsets the cost of using a third-party payment processor. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 1:10 am
In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 10:22 pm
Apple FRAND litigation in the Eastern District of Texas, Apple doesn't want Ericsson to conduct discovery of certain App Store issues. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:15 am
It may depend on whether Apple paid any money to the Toast Plus app or acted as a payment processor. [read post]
The new smartphone patents battlemap (infographic featuring Apple, Huawei, Intel, Qualcomm, Samsung)
14 Oct 2018, 11:52 am
Now we're approaching the end of the 2010s, and the disputes visualized by the battlemap above are the ones to watch.Just one last comment on similarities between Apple's litigation with Qualcomm and Samsung's with Huawei: I've uploaded an Apple reply brief to Scribd that notes Qualcomm dropped its request for a global FRAND determination in the Southern District of California (though Qualcomm still wants the U.S. district court to hold that… [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 11:11 am
As it announced in August, Samsung has filed a petition for writ of certiorari (request for Supreme Court review) today in its almost five-year-old litigation with Apple. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:35 pm
Samsung, which is currently locked in patent litigation with Apple, also the manufacturer of Apple’s third-generation processor, the A5X, according to iFixit. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:53 am
Apple's complaint already anticipated that Qualcomm would point to its corporate structure: "Qualcomm has attempted to evade the patent exhaustion doctrine by selling baseband processor chipsets to Apple's [contract manufacturers] through QTC, which is operated by QTI, which is in turn a wholly owned subsidiary of Qualcomm. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 9:37 pm
For years, Apple has used Intel-manufactured computer processors in its computers. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 9:37 pm
For years, Apple has used Intel-manufactured computer processors in its computers. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 9:35 pm
[from infosyncworld]IPBiz notes that one must measure the Palm Pre against the claims of Apple's patent(s).Gizmodo went to academic Polk Wagner for advice, and, as might be expected, got it wrong:The patent we're referring to is #7,479,949, awarded on January 20 of this year. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
In economic terms it is, however, pretty unimportant compared to the fact that Apple, due to its failure to make its own iPhone-grade baseband processor, had to extend the chipset purchasing agreement with Qualcomm by another three years (2024-2026), which presumably means that Apple exercised an option to extend its standard-essential patent royalty payments as well. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 9:40 am
But in light of the other case pending and, even more so, the public interest in fair competition in the wireless chipset market, they're important at any rate:With regard to the '336 patent, Qualcomm failed to satisfy the domestic industry requirement (rather unusual, and another hurdle it would have to overcome in the further proceedings).A U.S. import ban would adversely affect competition in the baseband processor market and may adversely affect the production of… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
Apple’s little iPad is growing up. [read post]
ITC judge didn't buy testimony for which Qualcomm paid a single expert $3-4 million in Apple dispute
31 Oct 2018, 8:14 am
Apple trial in Munich):18-09-28 ITC 337-TA-1065 Qu... by on Scribd18-10-22 ITC 337-TA-1065 Re... by on Scribd Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 5:13 am
It was a resounding victory for Qualcomm's counsel from multiple firms under the strategic leadership of Cravath Swaine & Moore's Gary Bornstein, whose work for Epic Games (against Apple and Google) I have mentioned many times.Still, there is a class action pending in the Northern District of California: In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust litigation, but no longer before Judge Lucy H. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 4:20 am
” 8 GPNE’s technical expert conceded that “each of the GPRS and LTE signals identified in [his] report are processed by the . . . base band processors in Apple products” and offered the same infringement theory for various accused Apple products because they all contained the same baseband processor chipsets.9 GPNE further confirmed that “the baseband processor ... enables the cellular functionality in… [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 11:56 pm
Yesterday (Friday), Qualcomm filed its motion for summary judgment: In Re Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation (case no. 3:17-md-2773-JSC, N.D. [read post]
