Search for: "In re Application of Corrigan"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2009, 10:06 am
It is a 4-3 decision, with Justices Baxter, Corrigan, and Chin filing a concurring and dissenting opinion. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:10 pm
Bouschor (application for leave pending), and entered remand orders in the following cases: People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 2:43 pm
The Michigan Supreme Court took substantive action in six cases: In re P.M. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
The Martins filed an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:43 am
On Wednesday January 27, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court denied 19 applications for leave to appeal, denied the petitioner-appellants’ motion for reconsideration in the case of In re Brandon Gavin Handorf, Case Nos. 139742, 139753, 139754, and adopted the recommendation of the Judicial Tenure Commission in In re Nebel, Case No. 140203, and In re Sanders, Case No. 140202. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:17 am
Res. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:17 am
Res. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:38 am
The Court also issued an order directing the Department of Human Services to answer the application for leave to appeal in In re CW, BW, and DW Minors, Case No. 140841. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 8:55 am
Justices Corrigan and Young concurred, Justice Weaver dissented based on the dissent in McGraw. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:34 am
"As the Herrle court recognized, primary assumption of risk in its occupational aspect is readily applicable to the relationship between hired," Corrigan wrote Monday. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 1:57 am
The Court also ordered the Oakland County Prosecutor to respond to the application for leave in People v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 11:32 am
Common Pleas June 10, 2011) (ruling re: motions for summary judgment) (available here). [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 11:32 am
Common Pleas June 10, 2011) (ruling re: motions for summary judgment) (available here). [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
Because the standards for insanity are extraordinarily high, and contrast in a plethora of substantive ways with defenses on the merits like imperfect self-defense.)Here's a pretty good summary of the holding, from page 11 of Justice Corrigan's opinion:"[U]nreasonable self-defense, as a form of mistake of fact, has no application when the defendant's actions are entirely delusional. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am
Justices Baxter and Corrigan were both recused. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:49 pm
The Court also ordered the Kent County Prosecuting Attorney to respond to an application for leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:00 am
Justice Corrigan says that goes to what's a reas [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
It held that the search was authorized under this court’s pre-Gant decision in In re Arturo D. (2002) 27 Cal.4th 60 (Arturo D.), which allowed police to conduct warrantless vehicle searches for personal identification documents at traffic stops when the driver failed to provide a license or other personal identification upon request.We granted review to consider the application and continuing validity of the Arturo D. rule in light of subsequent legal developments. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
The cases, [In re Edward Patrick Morgan] and [In re Samuel Zamudio Jimenez], deal with situations where the petitioner has gone without a habeas attorney for years — 13 years, in the case of Morgan. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
"Let's get to the heart of the issue—the applicable provisions," she said. [read post]
