Search for: "In re Application of Her Majesty The Queen"
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2014, 4:34 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:19 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:25 pm
The most recent additions were made in 2002 and are, respectively, the wills of Her late Majesty Queen Elizabeth, The Queen Mother and Her late Royal Highness The Princess Margaret, Countess of Snowdon. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:24 pm
Apart from waving at boats and feeding her Corgis, Queen Elizabeth has been quite busy lately. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Feeney v Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of Alberta, 2021 ABCA 255 (CanLII) [20] If the Court finds that the litigant has persistently engaged in one or more of the types of behaviour listed in s 23(2), it may issue a vexatious litigant order (as set out in s 23.1) but it does not have to. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:13 am
Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 3:49 am
The Prime Minister has responsibility for recommending to Her Majesty the appointment of a person as Lord President, but may not recommend any person who has not been nominated by the First Minister.Sir Muir Russell was appointed as lay Chairing Member of the Judicial Appointments Board for Scotland in October 2008 for a period of three years and re-appointed in October 2011 for a further three years. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:13 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:23 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Holt v Her Majesty’s Attorney General on behalf of the Queen, heard 15 – 16 January 2014. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Criminal Law: Constitutionality Re Parole IneligibilityAttorney General of Québec and Her Majesty the Queen v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:45 am
Her Majesty in Council may make laws and constitute courts as may appear to be necessary for the peace, order and good government of her subjects, as well as others living in the settlement. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:30 am
The Canterbury Cross is awarded for “outstanding service to the Church of England” and was given to the Queen in recognition and gratitude for Her Majesty’s “unstinting support of the Church throughout her reign” and to mark her Platinum Jubilee year; a specially cast version was made for Her Majesty with platinum inserts in honour of the Platinum Jubilee. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:34 am
However, Council officers were unaware of the re-burial in 2015. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:44 am
However, Council officers were unaware of the re-burial in 2015. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 1:45 am
However, Council officers were unaware of the re-burial in 2015. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm
On 18 May 2022, the actor and Reclaim Party founder Laurence Fox’s application for a trial by jury in his ongoing defamation litigation was refused by Nicklin J (Blake & Ors v Fox (Re Trial by Jury) [2022] EWHC 1124 (QB)). [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 11:03 am
As noted earlier in these reasons, the appropriate application of accumulated wisdom and inappropriate intrusion of judicial stereotyping is a fine line” that in this case, left the decision open to review (SCJ, para. 24). [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
So therefore, don’t go thinking that any three reports, like those above, and law society presidents’ and treasurers’ letters, mean: (1) that the law societies pick their facts to suit their published conclusions; and, (2) although they may be good at re-structuring, they are not so good at putting anything like a substantive innovation aimed at a solution, into their re-structured [read post]
