Search for: "In re Application of Ohio Power Co."
Results 81 - 100
of 211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
The application completed by plaintiff for each of the three Access Loans contains a statement whereby plaintiff acknowledges that the Access Loan Program is funded in part by nonprofit institutions. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 11:08 am
” Ohio v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm
” As near as I can understand, the Court found that because the veteran could have received benefits if he re-applied sooner, he was only barred from receipt of those benefits by reason of the timing of his re-application, not by a VA regulation (even though the regulation controls the relationship of the entitlement to benefits and the timing of the re-application for benefits.) [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm
” As near as I can understand, the Court found that because the veteran could have received benefits if he re-applied sooner, he was only barred from receipt of those benefits by reason of the timing of his re-application, not by a VA regulation (even though the regulation controls the relationship of the entitlement to benefits and the timing of the re-application for benefits.) [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
Unfortunately it appears that, instead of (or perhaps in addition to, given the recent election results) the Ten Commandments, there’s another commandment that the Alabama Supreme Court is following: Thou Shalt (if you’re an Alabamian) Recover From An Out-Of-State Drug Company.While the Alabama Supreme Court certainly has the power to abandon the notion of manufacturer liability for defects in its products (unlike a federal court sitting in diversity),… [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
HT Window Fashions Corp (Docket Report) District Court N D Ohio: Deliberate copying, litigation conduct warrant $10 million enhanced damages award [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:00 pm
[This post was co-authored by Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman] Introduction. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
Accord, e.g., In re Orthopedic Bone Screw Products Liability Litigation, 193 F.3d 781, 789-90 (3d Cir. 1999); In re Shigellosis Litigation, 647 N.W.2d 1, 10 (Minn. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
” This modified the old rules and constitutional application in which the jury or commissioners were judges of the law and the facts. 10 In re Public Highway in Elba Twp, 236 Mich 282, 284; 210 NW 297 (1926). 11 A precise discussion of the changes in the constitution appears in State Hwy Comm v Vanderkloot, 392 Mich 159, 169-176, 191; 220 NW2d 416 (1974). [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
New York Times Co. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Davis, 499 N.E.2d 1255, 1259 (Ohio Ct. 1985); Pestrak v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 12:20 pm
” As near as I can understand, the Court found that because the veteran could have received benefits if he re-applied sooner, he was only barred from receipt of those benefits by reason of the timing of his re-application, not by a VA regulation (even though the regulation controls the relationship of the entitlement to benefits and the timing of the re-application for benefits.) [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Morgan Keegan & Co., 2014 WL 1375038 (W.D. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
“You’re basically saying we shouldn’t look at it,” he told Purcell. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
After canvassing the many faces of native advertising and the applicable law, the series ultimately examines the pervasive assumption that all native advertising is, and should be regulated as, “commercial speech. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:14 pm
” In re Int’l Admin. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
I think that’s the underlying logic that’s powering the decision and public sentiment. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 3:23 am
See Ricoh Co. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
Bon Tool Co., 590 F.3d 1295 (Fed. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
Co. v. [read post]
