Search for: "In re Application of Rodgers"
Results 1 - 20
of 94
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2020, 3:00 am
Following up on my previous post, Court Cites Student Loans As Reason To Deny Bar Admission To New Lawyer: In re Application of Rodgers, Slip Op. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
In Re McCaughey & Anor [2011] UKSC 20 the Supreme Court, Lord Rodger dissenting, accepted the applicability of the Human Rights Act 1998 to the operation of inquests into pre-Human Rights Act killings. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 7:28 am
A preview of oral argument in a bar admission case by Dan Trevas on the web page of the Ohio Supreme Court In re: Application of Cynthia M. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:30 pm
We’re just trying to help you stay on the high side of the law. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
‘A lot’, the press would answer” – these were the memorable words of Lord Rodger in the Supreme Court in In re Guardian News and Media Ltd [2010] UKSC 1 [63]. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
McCaughey & Anor, Re Application for Judicial Review [2011] UKSC 20 (18 May 2011)- Read judgment The Supreme Court has followed the European Court of Human Rights in ruling that an inquest into the death of two people killed before the introduction of the Human Rights Act is still bound by the rules laid down by that Act. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
“One Church Warden’s rubbish may be another art dealer’s treasure“ Re Emmanuel Church, Leckhampton, Rodgers Ch. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
The judgment was given by Lord Rodger. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 9:02 am
But, if you’re a government employee, registration is also linked to employment. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 9:10 am
[Note: There are two cases for this defendant, so if you're really jonesing for the repetition, here's the other Bass, in pdf no less.]Rodger Grissam v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
Lord Rodger’s dictum in Re Guardian News and Media In Re Guardian News and Media, the Supreme Court discharged anonymity orders granted by the Treasury to individuals whose assets had been frozen on the grounds of suspected facilitation of terrorism. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
Lord Rodger’s dictum in Re Guardian News and Media In Re Guardian News and Media, the Supreme Court discharged anonymity orders granted by the Treasury to individuals whose assets had been frozen on the grounds of suspected facilitation of terrorism. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:50 am
Comment Aside from the colourful facts, and the detailed guidance on the application of res judicata in civil proceedings, the case is notable for the divergence of opinion between the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court in respect of public interest as a ground for allowing or dismissing the appeal on a technicality. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 7:14 pm
Before dealing with the main issues in the appeals, the Court, through Lord Rodger, gave a separate, unanimous judgment allowing the press application. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 2:38 am
Rodgers, Jr. has announced new court procedures under which Rodgers will personally hear all structured settlement transfer applications to determine the number of transfers and to establish uniform procedures for filing and handling transfers; and Rhode Island Attorney General Patrick C. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 3:35 am
Petrone, whatever the law lacks in frequency of application, it more than makes up for in confusion. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm
At [63]-[64] Lord Rodger stated: “What’s in a name? [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
The latter include heat and steam treatments, measures that are effective but notably do not prevent re-infestation. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am
The summary given on hand down (given by Lord Sumption) is here: Lords Wilson and Kerr, dissenting, took view that Lord Rodger in In re Guardian News and Media Ltd was stating a legal presumption that courts should act on the basis that most people believe that someone charged with an offence is innocent until proven guilty, but that he had offered no evidence or authority to support such a presumption. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 4:45 pm
" See In re Rodger’s Estate v. [read post]
