Search for: "In re Application of Rodgers"
Results 21 - 40
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2009, 4:45 pm
" See In re Rodger’s Estate v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:18 am
The minority, take the view that Lord Rodger in In re Guardian News and Media Ltd was stating a legal presumption that courts should act on the basis that most people believe that someone charged with an offence is innocent until proven guilty, but that he had offered no evidence or authority to support such a presumption. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:51 am
But he added: "An applicant would not be considered for the period of his disqualification. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:01 am
As recently as January 2010, Lord Rodger stated in In re Guardian News and Media Limited [2010] 2 WLR 325 that on the existing Strasbourg case law, a right to obtain any information which would not be otherwise available to a person “is not within the scope of Article 10(1)”. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 3:00 am
Senate acquitted President Trump of charges he abused his power and obstructed Congress to aid his own re-election, bringing an acrimonious impeachment trial to its expected end. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
” Rodgers offers a hasty interjection. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 10:32 pm
Stay tuned, we’ll keep you posted on developments with this interesting non-traditional trademark application. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:52 pm
Hsiao, under the guidance of Professor Nicholas RobinsonPoliticsSJD dissertation on public participation in South and North Korean environmental laws] / Byungchun So, Pace University School of LawRisk AnalysisThe application of the precautionary principle in practice : comparative dimensions / Joakim ZanderSciencePrinciples of environmental sciences / edited by Jan J. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 1:56 pm
Certainly that is how Martin Rodger QC, the Deputy President of the UT, approached matters. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 1:56 pm
Certainly that is how Martin Rodger QC, the Deputy President of the UT, approached matters. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
We're busy. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:47 pm
In R A, Re Judicial Review [2010] NIQB 27, the desired extension to an anonymity order was refused on the grounds that the applicant’s name had been disclosed earlier in proceedings. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 3:02 pm
” In re Marriage of Osseck, 183 NE 3d 980 – Ill: Appellate Court, 2nd Dist. 2021 Proving an increase in income is not rocket science. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
Silih v Slovenia (2009) 49 E.H.R.R. 37 – Read judgment, McCaughey and Quinn’s Application [2010] NICA 13 – Read judgment This is Part I of Matthew Hill’s feature. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:21 am
The panel consisted of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
Invoking Lord Rodger’s “what’s-in-the-name” dicta from Re Guardian News and Media, Lord Sumption considered that the public interest extended to reporting Mr Khuja’s identity, which was not peripheral or irrelevant [34(5)]. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm
The panel consisted of Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 7:17 am
However, much of the Judgment of the Court is orthodox and of continuing application and importance. [read post]
16 Jan 2006, 7:42 am
Pa. 12/16/05); In re Rodgers, __ B.R. __, 2005 WL 3454702 (Bankr. [read post]
16 Jan 2006, 7:42 am
Pa. 12/16/05); In re Rodgers, __ B.R. __, 2005 WL 3454702 (Bankr. [read post]
