Search for: "In re Asencio" Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2008, 4:28 pm
Bad Fact No. 1: Your six-year old niece has gonorrhea.Bad Fact No. 2: So do you.Bad Fact No. 3: Your niece tells the police, while crying, and utterly credibly, that you improperly touched her.Bad Fact No. 4: You admit to the police that you did indeed improperly touch her.Bad Fact No. 5: Your story as to how the niece contracted gonorrhea is that you were innocently tickling her on the bed, she left, you promptly got an erection and began to masterbate, she came back in and started jumping on and… [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:27 am by Todd Dawson
In truth, it seems the real distinction between Knepper and De Asencio is the fact that CAFA didn't exist when De Asencio was decided in 2003. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:40 pm by Steven G. Pearl
An employer's agreement to re-classify employees or to change policies and practices can bring great benefits going forward, and those benefits frequently outweigh the monetary payments being made.Because the Court held that the district court properly certified the class under Rule 23(b)(2), it did not examine whether certification was proper under Rule 23(b)(3). [read post]