Search for: "In re B.H.-1" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2022, 1:30 pm by Kate Fort
We agree with the E.M. division that information about the child’s heritage does not constitute “reason to know” that the child is an Indian child under section 19-1-126(1)(a)(II)(A). [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 3:32 am
Both parties are ordered to refrain from smoking near the child.The Court of Appeals begins its decision with a long quote from In re L.L. [read post]