Search for: "In re Banks" Results 241 - 260 of 22,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2009, 5:18 am
The bank would re-capitalize and an outside controller would be put in place to oversee the Millennium's operations. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:32 pm by Mike
 If you're a Wall Street bank, however, you may purchase Cuban cigars with money paid to you by drug dealers and terrorist nations. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:46 am
Now, with banks turning away their business, they're forced to jump through even more hoops to provide their services to patients that rely on them for treatments. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 7:32 am
By Hannah Fearn I recently had the pleasure of attending the 2019 BAFT Europe Bank to Bank Forum in London. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 7:32 am
By Hannah Fearn I recently had the pleasure of attending the 2019 BAFT Europe Bank to Bank Forum in London. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 3:54 am by jonathanturley
This morning Res Ipsa passed the 59,000,000 mark in views on the blog. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:14 am by Walter Olson
David Post: …ask yourself: if you think that the “use of an American bank” is a sufficient basis for the exercise of US jurisdiction over foreign nationals residing and conducting business abroad, then presumably you’re OK with being hauled into court in Singapore because you have used, say, a Singaporean bank, or into a Mexican court because your money found its way to a Mexican mortgage broker, or into a Danish court because you have at times… [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:41 pm by Ronald Mann
Bank of America revealed a bench of justices struggling to reconcile provisions of the National Bank Act that protect national banks with a New York statute requiring all banks (including national banks) to pay interest on the escrow accounts they hold for their mortgage customers. [read post]
28 May 2010, 11:16 am by Fei-Lu Qian
Despite trends towards recovery from the financial crisis, data suggests we’re not out of the woods yet. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:59 am by Stacy
Just a short follow up to our prior post regarding the Federal Circuit’s upcoming consideration of the patent-eligibility of computer-implemented inventions….Patently-O has collected the briefs filed to date in support of the defendant or in support of neither party, including the brief filed by the writers of this blog on behalf of Internet Retailers (in support of neither party, but promoting a stronger subject matter eligibility standard). [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 10:11 am
But you're still going to need to see a bankruptcy lawyer after the partying is done. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 11:55 am by Rick Hills
So far as I can tell, sheer legal atavism: McCulloch and its progeny are stuck in our legal code like a self-replicating computer virus: Once cited, the preemption language gets re-cited and re-re-cited until, like the Bellman's cry ("Just the Place for a Snark! [read post]