Search for: "In re Bar Application of Stevens" Results 1 - 20 of 284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2009, 1:32 pm
Given these valid applications, isolated hypothetical applications are insufficient to show the overbreadth required to find a statute facially invalid. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 7:02 am
The Examiner cited In re Stevens (101 USPQ 284 (CCPA 1954)) for the proposition that adjustability involves only routine skill in the art. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm by Kali Borkoski
Question:   So as you’re writing, who was the audience you had in mind? [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Jim Harper
The Court reversed the Court of Appeals, which had held that the defense of fair use was barred by the song’s commercial character and excessive borrowing. 3. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:07 am by Staci Zaretsky
” Here’s some proof that there’s such a thing as work/life balance in Biglaw… which is only applicable if you’re a partner. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
I believe it matters greatly whether the rule is considered a bar or a presumption. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 6:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The remaining shareholders then decided to re-open Anello Brothers over Emilio Sr. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:50 am by Steven M. Gursten
Check out the Michigan Auto Law website for “Application for Benefits” forms for various insurance companies that you can use. - Steven M. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 6:43 pm by Chris Castle
If you’re not familiar with the “mass NOI” problem, here’s the explanation in a nutshell:  two factors collide to create massive confusion. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 5:21 pm by emp
“Most egregious situations” is a rather high bar. [read post]