Search for: "In re Barbara P. (1994)" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The ban was lifted in 1993 and 1994 but, in 1995, an anti-choice majority in Congress restored the ban. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
He says that "verbatim passages from lawyers' briefs" appear in the opinions, without attribution (p. 21). [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
City of Santa Barbara (1932) 123 Cal.App. 508, 513; see In re Marriage of Fink, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 888 ["It {Slip Opn. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
Her parents, respondents Hugh and Barbara Cassidy, inherited the rights to Eva’s work. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[71] Justice Arbour noted that, in explaining the standard to a jury, it might be preferable to re-word the standard of causation using positive terms, for example, a phrase such as a “‘significant contributing cause’ rather than using expressions phrased in the negative such as ‘not a trivial cause’ or ‘not insignificant’. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
[Bloggers Note:  Today's guest column comes from noted Atlanta-based business immigration lawyer, Eileen M.G. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
[Bloggers Note:  Today's guest column comes from noted Atlanta-based business immigration lawyer, Eileen M.G. [read post]