Search for: "In re Barrick"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 2:03 pm
As the writer of the amicus brief on behalf of the Pennsylvania Defense Institute in favor of the defense position, I just received notification from the Pennsylvania Superior Court that the Re-Argument en banc in the case of Barrick v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 7:04 am
BREAKING NEWS: The Pennsylvania Superior Court has issued an Order granting re-argument en banc in the case of Barrick v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 9:50 am
On October 19, 2010, I participated, as the defense perspective, in the Pennsylvania Association for Justice's teleseminar on the recent expert discovery decision of Barrick v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:59 am
On April 5, 2011, I attended the re-argument of the Barrick v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 10:59 am
Matthew DeMichele, Peter Baumgartner, Michael Wenger, Kelle Barrick, Megan Comfort and Shilpi Misra (RTI International, RTI International, RTI International, RTI International, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and RTI International) have posted The Public Safety Assessment: A Re-Validation and Assessment... [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:05 am
Tort Talkers may recall that, on November 19, 2010, the Pennsylvania Superior Court granted the Plaintiff’s Petition for Re-argument and withdrew its opinion in Barrick v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:05 am
Tort Talkers may recall that, on November 19, 2010, the Pennsylvania Superior Court granted the Plaintiff’s Petition for Re-argument and withdrew its opinion in Barrick v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:29 pm
Then, on re-argument before an en banc panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed and held that these communications were not discoverable. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:41 am
Last year, the Superior Court sent a shiver through the bar with its opinion in Barrick v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:56 am
Thereafter, on re-argument before an en banc panel of the Pennsylvania Superior Court, the previous decisions were reversed and that court held that the communications from the attorney to the expert were not discoverable. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:28 am
Well, it has been a long, strange trip for Barrick v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:12 pm
Still permitted is the full discovery of the expert’s final opinion and of the facts or data used to support the opinions.It is noted that this same issue is still under review in the state appellate court here in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania with the recently allowed re-argument en banc of the case of Barrick v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:35 pm
In re Norman R. [read post]
30 May 2019, 6:00 am
The re-emergence of the mega-deal. 2018 and 2019 have seen a number of deals that are noteworthy not just for their size, but for their implications to the mining landscape. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 1:53 pm
Natural Res. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:21 pm
These amendments to this expert discovery Rule incorporated the law of Barrick v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
These amendments to this expert discovery Rule incorporated the law of Barrick v. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 11:24 am
Recently, the court granted allocatur to squarely address this issue in Barrick v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 5:08 pm
The legal process was used by an individual who complained that Globe24th.com, a site hosted and operated from Romania, was re-publishing decisions of Canadian courts and tribunals containing personal information including personal information about him, for the purpose of demanding fees from aggrieved persons to take the content down. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm
In a Sept. 16 opinion, the panel rejected a plaintiff's contention that letters and e-mails discussing trial strategy sent between a party's expert witness and that party's attorney are discoverable were protected by the attorney work product doctrine.The plaintiff argued in Barrick v. [read post]
