Search for: "In re Bartlett"
Results 141 - 160
of 437
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
(The Bartlett appeal is one example.) [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 7:40 pm
In re The Vill. at Lakeridge, 814 F.3d 993, 1005. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Bartlett, 133 S. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 4:30 am
We’re not saying that the Sullivan case is a complete train-wreck, but it is not exactly pleasant beach reading either. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:53 am
While this new statistic proves a decrease in the number of fatalities from these types of accidents, we're still seeing far too many of these preventable accidents. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
Bartlett produced a couple of decent rulings, and then it produced some monstrous ones, followed by a $21 million verdict. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 9:22 am
Similarly in In re Fosamax Litigation, 2012 WL 181411 (D.N.J. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:16 am
(Thanks to Joe Bartlett for sending the link.) [read post]
5 May 2011, 12:53 pm
Jeff Bartlett of Consumer Reports says, “The police are using the information not only to determine traffic flows, but reportedly, they’re also using it to set up speed traps. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 12:07 pm
Bartlett to the student body about the incident. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 6:10 pm
They're our guests. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
While this “stop selling” or “never sell” theory has been labeled in various ways (including “fraud on the FDA”) to meet the plaintiff’s particular needs, it seems to us like a re-framing of design defect, albeit without pesky requirements like a feasible alternative design, no liability with adequate (or without inadequate) warnings, or proximate cause. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 7:10 am
See In re Renren, Inc., 192 A.D.3d 539, 140 N.Y.S.3d 701 (2021). [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 2:15 pm
A copy of our Chairman's memo appears below.We're all looking forward to seeing you soon.All the best, DeeDee PiferSimpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP We're working on a few other confirmations. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 5:49 am
By contrast, in In re The Boeing Co. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
We’re doing it again. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:50 am
Bartlett and Steele also discuss problems in research in the US. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 9:35 am
“We’re happy,” said Lee. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:16 am
The second cause of action, alleging legal malpractice, is barred under the doctrine of res [*2]judicata by the court's imprimatur of a retaining lien (see Kinberg v Garr, 28 AD3d 245 [2006]; Molinaro v Bedke, 281 AD2d 242 [2001]; Summit Solomon & Feldesman v Matalon, 216 AD2d 91 [1995], lv denied 86 NY2d 711 [1995]; see generally Blair v Bartlett, 75 NY 150, 154 [1878]). [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:07 am
The second cause of action, alleging legal malpractice, is barred under the doctrine of res [*2]judicata by the court's imprimatur of a retaining lien (see Kinberg v Garr, 28 AD3d 245 [2006]; Molinaro v Bedke, 281 AD2d 242 [2001]; Summit Solomon & Feldesman v Matalon, 216 AD2d 91 [1995], lv denied 86 NY2d 711 [1995]; see generally Blair v Bartlett, 75 NY 150, 154 [1878]). [read post]
