Search for: "In re Best (1983)"
Results 1 - 20
of 632
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 6:47 pm
The matter of historic precedent for privacy can be best illustrated by the front two pages of the New York Daily Herald for December 5, 1848. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 11:41 pm
Crystal Castles, Atari’s 1983 arcade game—not to be confused with the canceled Canadian electropunk duo. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Interpretation, in these matters, is invariably a function of the premises and principles one brings to them--along with the toolkit of interpretive methodologies which can translate premise into an interpretation that is correct or the best precisely because it most closely aligns with the privileged premises that drove the analysis. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:54 am
When Sam died in 1983 and Ruth in 1984, Dennis and Evette turned to each other. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
[Why did Jonathan Mitchell not vigorously defend Griffin's Case and Chief Justice Chase? [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
” In re Urban Renewal (City of Detroit v. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
There was disappointment, interpretation, and rationalizations among all individuals and collectives (political, religious, social, public, private, etc.) desperately hungry to have the ICJ serve as their instrument for the advancement of whatever agendas drive them when it comes to the Jews living in the Republic of Israel; and yet collectives seemed to try to make the best of the decision for their own ends (eg here, here, here, here, here, here, and here). [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 7:42 am
Indeed, in a 1983 case, Herrera v. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 7:25 am
” In re Marriage of Leopando, 449 NE 2d 137 – Ill: Supreme Court 1983 (quotations omitted) Judicial economy is for the benefit of the judge. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Depending on the nature of the evil, we might completely re-evaluate the figure and their work. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
Comm’n, 713 F.2d 918, 926 (2d Cir. 1983). [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
In In re Solera Holdings, Inc. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" The latter provides, "Before [the President] enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation: — "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.'" Justice Hood inquired, "What about the use of 'officer of the United States' in Article Two and… [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 10:46 am
We shouldn't ignore these cases just because they're old. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am
Take, for example, Section 1983. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 10:41 am
Ct. 1983)” Leib v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:02 am
Sources, Characteristics, and Identification E. coli is an archetypal commensal bacterial species that lives in mammalian intestines. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 7:59 am
They're thinking about Rome as depicted in Marvel movies and other pop culture fluff. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
He cites Eleventh Circuit cases and the Supreme Court's 1890 decision in In Re Neagle. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Since rule 2a-7 was initially adopted in 1983, the SEC has amended the rule several times in response to market events highlighting MMF vulnerabilities, including the 2008 financial crisis, which resulted in two significant rounds of amendments in 2010 and in 2014 to, among other things, reduce the interest rate, credit and liquidity risks of MMFs, provide for fees and gates to stem heavy redemptions, and require floating NAVs for institutional MMFs to address runs.[4] With the notable… [read post]
