Search for: "In re Buchanan" Results 121 - 140 of 753
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Consider the wording of a quotation that I noted in last week’s column, which I have highlighted here by underlining a few key phrases: “House Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Subcommittee Chairman Ander Crenshaw told the IRS that Congress ‘deliberately lowered IRS funding to a level that will make the IRS think twice about what you’re doing and why you’re doing it. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
There was never any mystery about Donald Trump’s ignorance of the Constitution or his disdain for the rule of law. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
They’re why these quisling lawmakers held their noses and accepted so much bad, sometimes criminal, behavior from this administration.The balance of Rampell’s column is devoted to listing all of the ways in which Republicans have sold their collective souls: “The lure of packing the bench with conservative justices is presumably why Republican officials abandoned their putative commitments to limited government and free markets,” to free trade, and so on. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
They are simply saying, “No, we won’t work with you to do anything, and we’re hiding behind a semantic argument over the meaning of the word infrastructure because we have nothing useful to say. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  Democrats were apparently supposed to say, “We’re all terrified of Trump winning, so we can’t do anything but be unified at all times. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
My recent columns here on Verdict and on Dorf on Law paint an unmistakable picture of doom and gloom. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Republicans have been gunning for Social Security for decades. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
” “The Simpsons” is the most successful sitcom in television history, and it is saying, “We don’t need to change with the times, and if you don’t like it, you’re the ones with the problem. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Thus we experienced a few news cycles during which politicians debated whether the government should spend money to re-seed the grass in the National Mall. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
With that quick “well, obviously, we’ll respond if we’re able” dismissal out of the way, the rest of the letter is an attempt to explain why the dean’s decisions are within her power. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The world is still in the early stages of trying to comprehend the horrors that took place in Paris last week. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Herbin-Triant (University of Massachusetts Lowell) marks the 100th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Buchanan v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 1:26 pm by SO Issues
They're looking at removing thousands of non-violent offenders from the list. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 5:31 pm
Milton Friedman's death has spurred me to re-read Capitalism and Freedom, which I have not done in decades. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 7:34 am
The order varies, but they're first and second. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 3:22 am by Jon Gelman
Now they're called Mosaic Life Care, because, their promotional materials say: "We offer much more than health care. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Early last week, a media firestorm unexpectedly broke out about a government report that, according to Republicans, proved that the Affordable Care Act (also known as the ACA—or, to Republicans, the dreaded “Obamacare”) would “kill” millions of jobs. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
They are stuck in the past, claiming that the Department of Motor Vehicles is proof that the government is an evil cabal of freedom-hating latte drinkers.I was, on the other hand, a bit surprised that the mainstream press has gone along with Republicans’ re-framing of the Biden bill as not being devoted to spending on “real” infrastructure. [read post]