Search for: "In re Buchanan"
Results 161 - 180
of 753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
It is simply wrong to say: “Republicans unconstitutionally targeted Democratic-controlled states by limiting SALT, but now that we have the power to legislate, we’re going to leave that constitutionally invalid provision in place—because we want to show that we’re progressive. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
We judge people the way we’re judged–by the job they do. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Much of the commentary about the nascent 2020 presidential race is truly puzzling. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
If, for example, the federal government were to take in three trillion dollars while it is legally committed to spending four trillion dollars, the one-trillion-dollar difference would be financed by borrowing on the open financial markets.But what if Congress says to the President: “We know you cannot do what you’re legally required to do without borrowing the necessary trillion dollars, but even so, we’re not going to update the debt ceiling statute to allow you… [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Buchanan, With all due respect to your accomplishments… No, Sir. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
As I suggested in my March 12 Verdict column, the only way that this outcome could be avoided would be for the president to say, “You’re not getting the money that you are owed today, when it’s due, and you’re never going to get it. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
The reason that this particular column is worth taking the time to criticize, however, is that Abernathy’s explanations for why his fellow White small-town Ohioans are still supporting Trump amounted to saying, “But they’re good people. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
We’re British subjects, and we’re about to break the law—big time. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
You’re canceled! [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:13 am
Doggett, who nonetheless won re-election. [read post]
27 May 2011, 9:44 am
Campbell and Esselstyn, on the other hand, can plausibly be characterized as less an abusive attack ("They're crazy sprout-lovers") than the statement that they have honestly become obsessed with an idee fixe. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 12:01 am
As the timing indicates, Clinton's signing of those laws represents the fruits of his triangulation strategy, as he adopted Republican policies in the months leading up to his re-election. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:30 am
This is especially interesting to me, because one of my first attempts to write for an audience of legal scholars (which was first drafted in 1998, but re-edited and published many years later as a book chapter) was largely and explicitly devoted to warning of the dangers of assuming arguendo the premises of one's ideological opponents. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 5:12 am
As much as people like me moan and complain, everyone knows that we will support Obama for re-election next year, first grudgingly but with increasing enthusiasm as we contemplate the prospect of any of his potential opponents as president. [read post]
16 May 2011, 2:11 pm
The Post also reports, however, that a genuine progressive, Minnesota's Amy Klobuchar, is "undecided" about raising the debt limit.As The Post points out, Klobuchar is running for re-election next year in a purple state. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 5:14 am
Payments to its beneficiaries amount to 5 percent of the economy now; by 2050, they’re projected to rise to about 6 percent. ... [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:12 am
The public simply becomes disgusted with everyone in the mud fight, failing to distinguish truth from lies, and allowing the narrative to take hold that "they're all the same. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:42 pm
" Most of the time, this argument is simply made as a stand-alone, res ipsa loquitur argument. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:00 am
It ends up, as I have argued before, being an exercise in re-labeling and reassigning the same responsibilities.It is, of course, possible that the IRS and/or the Fed are subject to some sort of incurable internal rot, such that shutting them down and starting over would be a net plus. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:29 am
So, if I own a piece of land, and it starts to rise in value because the local government re-zones the area for residential development, I do not have to pay tax on the gains until -- that is, unless -- I sell the land. [read post]
