Search for: "In re Bunker"
Results 141 - 160
of 389
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2015, 2:50 pm
We here in the CommLawBlog bunker confess that this is a first for us, so we can’t reliably predict whether the D.C. [read post]
4 May 2015, 12:55 pm
Tam re-filed his application in 2011. [read post]
2 May 2015, 2:48 pm
I think of him as an Ivy League-version of Archie Bunker, Borat or Ali G. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:15 am
Perhaps a sign that the United States is not fully confident that a deal with Iran come to fruition, the Pentagon has upgraded and tested a “bunker-bomb” that is powerful enough to disable Iran’s most fortified nuclear facilities. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 9:35 am
We plan to provide a detailed look at the rules and the accompanying Report and Order – said to exceed 300 pages in length – once they’re released.] [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 3:00 am
When you see the documentary on Exile, it gives an impression of jamming away spontaneously for a few hours in the bunker until we got something, until we’re ready to go for a take, as if we’re trusting something coming from the ether. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 3:00 am
When you see the documentary on Exile, it gives an impression of jamming away spontaneously for a few hours in the bunker until we got something, until we’re ready to go for a take, as if we’re trusting something coming from the ether. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 8:20 pm
” Stop the presses and raise a glass in belated farewell toast to Archie Bunker’s generic beer! [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 8:43 am
You’re better off coming back to me for my thoughts on the winner of the next FIFA World Cup or UEFA Champions League. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 11:38 am
We here in the CommLawBlog bunker are pleased about this recognition of the talent in our midst. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:58 am
If you are a thug and worthless to society, it’s not race – You’re just a waste no matter what religion, race or sex you are! [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:36 am
This retention of bureaucratese could be intentional, although we’re at a loss to understand why. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 9:21 pm
I know that their actions in this area will not be transparent to the public, but I hope they're on top of it. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 3:58 pm
We down here in the CommLawBlog bunker want to shine a spotlight – make that a high intensity white strobe – on the Tower Family Foundation. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:48 pm
Simon Dawes: We’re all familiar with the ways in which certain journalists, editors and media proprietors strategically use ‘press freedom’ or ‘public interest’ to justify their otherwise questionable actions (as governments tend to play the ‘national security’ card whenever they’re embarrassed by the press), but you’ve also recently accused the press itself of being a major threat to press freedom, claiming that… [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 2:02 am
For our purposes here, we’re going to go with five minutes per as a relatively conservative estimate. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 3:56 am
It sucks that we have to watch our tax dollars go there instead of happier things we prefer, like Bunker Buster Bombs or mine-proof armored personnel carriers to raid poker games and run down chickens? [read post]
18 May 2014, 1:07 pm
“.buzz”, “.webcam” – If you’re a broadcast station and you want to establish (or reinforce) the fact that you’re on top of what’s happening, how about “.buzz” – as in “TheCommLawBlog.buzz”? [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:51 am
We have had to shed a history of separate national trade mark cultures in order to adopt a new order, and we're getting there, he said. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
Then they’re going to hustle back for a live online discussion and analysis of the arguments at 3:00 p.m. that afternoon (Tuesday, April 22, 2014). [read post]
