Search for: "In re C.J"
Results 21 - 40
of 361
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Snider [1925] A.C. 396 per Viscount Haldane), or, as Justice Jean Beetz put it, “a national emergency of the same significance as war, pestilence or insurrection”—including (and Beetz J. here dissented) double-digit inflation (Reference re Anti-Inflation Act, [1976] 2 S.C.R. 373). [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 8:10 pm
A childish – but sinister – way of saying “You’re so wrong, I don’t even have to explain why you’re wrong. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
Doe Run Res. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 5:12 am
As C.J. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 2:46 pm
Internet Law E-Commerce E-Contract Electronic Contract Formation Computerized Hiring Application Arbitration Electronic Record Electronic Signature Texas Law Federal Law The Texas Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (the Act) states that “an electronic record or electronic signature is attributable to a person by showing . . . the efficacy of any security procedure applied to determine the… [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 7:43 am
., 567 U.S. at 553 (opinion of Roberts, C.J.); accord id. at 649–60 (Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito, JJ., dissenting). [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 11:46 am
C.J. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 2:52 pm
INTRODUCTION In this post, I propose that the concept of bona fides, or acting in good faith, be applied to the conduct of constitutional actors. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
“Veni, vidi, vici”: Julius Caesar, 47 BC The more than ten-year-old effort by Access Copyright (“AC”) to impose a “mandatory tariff” through the Copyright Board on Canadian educational institutions is over in a quick, decisive, and devastating unanimous judgment from Justice Rosalie Abellaof the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”). 85 years of legislative policy and SCC jurisprudence are re-affirmed, vindicated, and continued. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 9:20 am
Rooksby, C.J. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:12 am
See id. at 425 (concurring opinion of Celebrezze, C.J.). [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 5:00 am
Jan. 20, 2021) (Op. by Saylor, C.J.), the court addressed the current status of the law in Pennsylvania regarding res judicata and the collateral estoppel doctrine in a case involving a tax appeal. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 11:05 am
Professor C.J. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:20 am
United States, 529 U.S. 848, 857 (2000) (internal citation omitted); see also NFIB, 567 U.S. at 562 (Opinion of Roberts, C.J.). [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
Sorry, you're stuck. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:20 am
While C.J. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
., 2009 SCC 61, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 640, at para. 2, per McLachlin C.J. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:20 am
Josh compares it to the rift between C.J. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:00 pm
[13]Georgia Malone, 19 N.Y.3d at 521 (Lippman, C.J., dissenting) (quoting Mandarin Trading, 16 N.Y.3d at 182) [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 3:29 am
After all, they have life tenure, and it’s not as if C.J. [read post]
