Search for: "In re Caremark Intern, Inc. Derivative Litigation" Results 21 - 40 of 72
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2021, 5:49 am
The Delaware Court of Chancery has also recently issued several opinions concerning claims that boards failed to oversee company operations under standard established by In re Caremark International Inc. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 6:38 pm
Where once those connections and alignments were personal and grounded in assumptions about character, now they are increasingly bound up in inferences (or judgments) derived from measurable actions, events or conditions that are judged against an ideal derived from standards that are relevant to assessing communities. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
San Francisco Nov. 16, 2020), and In re Dropbox, Inc. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
If the merger objection lawsuits are disregarded, the litigation rate translates to about 4.7%, which although below the record-level litigation rates during the period 2017 -2019 is still well above the 1996-2018 annual litigation rate of 3.0%. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
How does your board define “informed decision-making” in this new environment, and what internal or external resources are being brought in to help keep the board informed? [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
An early example of Lorenzo having an impact (albeit short-lived) in private litigation is In re Longfin Corp Sec. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 11:19 pm by Doug Cornelius
”[2]  These “Caremark claims”—named after the Court of Chancery’s seminal decision in this area, In re Caremark International Inc. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The Delaware Supreme Court, applying the ‘duty to monitor’ doctrine enunciated in In re Caremark International, Inc. [read post]