Search for: "In re Child of Katherine C." Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2023, 2:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
[So concludes a federal judge, issuing a preliminary injunction against enforcement of the law.] [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 9:17 pm by Chuck Cosson
And if you cut them down, and you're just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm by fjhinojosa
Beyer’s book Texas Practice Series: Law Of Wills (4th Ed. 2019) is cited in the following article: Katherine C. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal ‘C’est Moi’: Mitt Romney admits to running secret Twitter account under the alias ‘Pierre Delecto’ MSN – Allyson Chiu (Washington Post) | Published: 10/21/2019 For years, Pierre Delecto’s presence on Twitter largely went unnoticed. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 2:36 pm by Sophia Cope
Professor Hany Farid, an expert in at-scale, resilient hashing of child exploitative imagery, wondered why the tech companies could not create digital fingerprinting solutions for opioid sales. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Trump Hotel Mystery: Giant reservations followed by empty rooms Politico – Anita Kumar | Published: 10/2/2019 House investigators are looking into an allegation that groups, including at least one foreign government, tried to ingratiate themselves to President Trump by booking rooms at his hotels but never staying in them. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
(If you’re not interested in the more US-specific discussion, I suggest starting a few paragraphs into Question 10.) [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm by Daphne Keller
(If you’re not interested in the more US-specific discussion, I suggest starting a few paragraphs into Question 10.) [read post]
1 May 2016, 11:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Platforms have become good at moderation of TOS-violating content; they’re much better than the gov’t, and also unlike the gov’t they’re allowed to do it. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Guest Blogger
These could include disestablishing or privatizing marriage in favor of a contractual model, or broadening it (or some new legal status) to include caring relationships of whatever number and mix of genders.[3] Ronald C. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 3:20 am by Steve Lombardi
Okay, the fact you're still here means you're half way there and tired of living on a prayer. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:16 pm by Adam Thierer
Commenting on Anscombe’s framework, Jenny Teichman and Katherine C. [read post]