Search for: "In re Clarence B." Results 41 - 60 of 168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2019, 2:00 am by Dinita L. James, Gonzalez Law, LLC
She has felt such optimism before, including when Anita Hill came forward in 1991 for the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 6:57 am by Ronald Mann
” Chief Justice John Roberts was preoccupied with what would happen under Geyser’s position if “one district decides they’re going to buy computers from computer company A and another says no, we’re going to buy them from B. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:43 pm by Jeff Gamso
 And therein . . . .Well, like I said, you can sort of see where this is going to go.Consider the Clarence Thomas chapter. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
Or sixths, if we’re talking about Friedman v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am by Derek T. Muller
So six justices, Chief Justice Roberts, Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett all agreed with heart of the reasoning in the per curiam opinion. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am by Derek T. Muller
So six justices, Chief Justice Roberts, Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett all agreed with heart of the reasoning in the per curiam opinion. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 4:21 am by SHG
But does that potential juror have a picture of Clarence Thomas over his bed? [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 5:22 am
The justices referred the case back to a federal district court to re-evaluate Mr. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage writes that “[b]ased on his experience later, including serving as the staff secretary to President George W. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 9:29 am
The justices referred the case back to a federal district court to re-evaluate Mr. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:37 am
Holy a) wasn't a wealthy country and western singer and b) didn't have a witness, do you think the department would have acted on his complaint? [read post]
rec
5 Feb 2008, 12:52 pm
It's true that we're coming at the question from different starting points, but I think the divide is much wider than she recognizes. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:11 am by Robert Percival
He observed that “people settle cases all the time where … they’re not going to admit they were liable, but they might agree to take actions. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:57 am by SHG
The reason is that it tells prosecutors to stop putting a “capital B” next to the names of the jurors they plan to strike, so as not to make a hard record of their racism, and then they’re home free. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:54 pm by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia
So, give me a reason why Congress would do something different in (B)(i) and (B)(ii). [read post]