Search for: "In re Court Order Dated October 22, 2003" Results 1 - 20 of 142
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am by Chris Wesner
Petitioning Creditors ask that the Court affirm the October 25 Order. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 10:24 am
October 12, 2007Re: Although The Conventional Wisdom Of The Pols And The Mainstream Media Have Now Anointed Him A Hero, In Truth Jack Goldsmith Stands Convicted Out Of His Own Mouth As Well As By Recent Events.Dear Colleagues: By Thursday, October 4th, I had been doing preparatory work for roughly three weeks in order to write about Jack Goldsmith's new book, The Terror Presidency ("TP"), which deals mainly with Goldsmith's work as head of the Office… [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 11:58 am by Wolfgang Demino
The bankruptcy court entered a discharge order providing that certain debts, including those for most student loans, were not discharged. [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:35 pm
A conference was held on that date, and the parties were given until October 6, 2006 to file objections to the accounting. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
The Tax Court sustained the lien notices for 2002 and 2003. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:06 am by Joel R. Brandes
On October 2, the court issued an order directing communication to the Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 2:33 am
Greenberg dated February 22, 2006 it is stated: "It is understood that you and your wife will be solely responsible for any fees awarded your out-going attorneys. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 2:33 am
Greenberg dated February 22, 2006 it is stated: "It is understood that you and your wife will be solely responsible for any fees awarded your out-going attorneys. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 6:47 am by Kate Fort
    October 22, 1993    252 Ill.App.3d 33    622 N.E.2d 832 10. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:29 am by Stephen Bilkis
A subsequent motion seeking, in effect, to reargue or renew, was denied by order dated 2 October 2003. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am by Laura Sandwell
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Re an application by Central Craigavon Ltd for Judicial Review, heard 15 May 2013. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am by Chris Wesner
(“Tagnetics”) in civil contempt of this court’s Order Granting in Part Tagnetics’ Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 101) and Ordering Other Matters entered on October 25, 2019 (doc. 119) (the “Settlement Enforcement Order”). [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal considered whether the Court of Appeal was wrong to set aside the award made at first instance on the Respondent’s claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, and whether, in deciding to re-exercise the court’s discretion to make an award under this Act, the Court of Appeal erred in taking account of the factual position as at the date of the appeal rather than the date of the original… [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The answer at this stage is unclear, as these manuscript products are largely untested in the courts. [read post]