Search for: "In re D.J."
Results 1 - 20
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 10:40 am
This stands out:Funny for New York Magazine to be linking to that "handful of women" story now.Did you still remember Lucy Flores, Amy Lappos, D.J. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
He then sued in federal court, prompting a motion to dismiss on res judicata grounds on the theory that he was improperly trying to relitigate these issues in a different court.The Court of Appeals (Carney and Liman [D.J.]) holds that plaintiff can bring this lawsuit despite the Article 78 loss. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
“You’re too honest,” Trump berated Pence as he refused to go along with the election plot, according to the indictment. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
You’re in Growing Company. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:54 pm
In D.J. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:25 am
In Inter-Cooperative Exchange v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:03 am
Top University of Florida officials asserted that it was a conflict of interest for professors to testify in the lawsuit because they're state employees. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 6:00 am
As the Court of Appeals (Cabranes, Raggi and Kaplan [D.J.]), "Not all accommodations are reasonable. . . . [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 12:28 pm
D.J. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 12:48 pm
Id. at *5 (Chhabria, D.J., concurring). [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 1:52 pm
Players:Decision by visiting D.J. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 6:23 am
"Thus, any reasonable officer would have understood in April 2015 that, if he or she has an opportunity to re-assess a situation after firing a taser, any additional force (such as re-cycling the taser) must be justified under the Fourth Amendment based upon the totality of the circumstances that existed at the time of the re-assessment. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:30 am
Baum, P.C., and Charles D.J. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 5:31 am
In re D.J., 2018-Ohio-569 (2018) (9th Dist.) [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:37 am
In re D.J., 2018-Ohio-569 (2018) (9th Dist.) [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 10:33 am
Seizing this assurance, on appeal the government argued it was unnecessary to vacate the life sentence, because the D.J. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 11:42 am
” Id.at *8.Of Note: In this case, it drove the D.J. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 3:22 pm
Based on Ninth precedent, the D.J. imposed the bump. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
(D.J.), 2013 ABPC 101, Ottewell v Ottewell 2013 ONSC 721. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 4:26 pm
Smith, joined by Judge Berzon and D.J. [read post]
