Search for: "In re David B." Results 81 - 100 of 2,520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2024, 3:52 am
Or after a devastating justice department report said his memory is shot due to old age, was he about to do a Lyndon B Johnson and announce he is not seeking re-election? [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:55 am by Daniel Shaviro
 So, leaving aside a lot of important design details, in some ways it's like having a better-designed retail sales tax.Only the ignorant and the disingenuous (but both groups are legion in Washington) would assert that, say, a comprehensive and decently enforced 40% retail sales tax would raise "competitiveness" issues in re. attracting global investment to the United States.If the DBCT is indeed enacted, it would certainly serve a lot of folks right (but also raise… [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 3:40 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
There's no way voters will re-elect you in 2016. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 5:45 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Mariano C Melero, Weak constitutionalism and the legal dimension of the constitution Dana Burchardt, The concept of legal space: A topological approach to addressing multiple legalities David Vitale & Raphaël Girard, Public trust and the populist leader: A theoretical argument       [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:00 am by Staci Zaretsky
“[B]y relative standards, we’re still doing that,” he said. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 11:40 am by Bill Raftery
Some states, such as Michigan and Wisconsin, allow for a judge running for re-election to have the designation “incumbent” after their name. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:38 am
Over the last fortnight in the States, the ways in which good teaching is a) developed and b) recognised have come under re-evaluation in the States â€" the former by New York State education officials, the latter by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:00 pm
If you have “trust issues,” you’re not alone. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Family judges, such as those in the Court of Appeal in Re T and in B and C (above) should be publicising the names of the people who are abusing their partners and children, and for one of the reasons that Charlie Pearce’s name was publicised. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 10:10 pm
Trial court erred by not setting aside default where party missed hearing due to hospitalization - Birmingham attorney Ivan B. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:06 am by Matt Osenga
The § 102(b) grace period is cut back—it no longer protects against activities by third parties, but only the inventor’s own activities. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:23 am
[Answer in first comment].In re David Copeland-Smith, Serial No. 85498107 ((March 9, 2018) (Opinion by Judge Albert Zervas) [not precedential]. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 3:35 am
[Answer in first comment].In re Michael-David, LLC, Serial No. 88662293 (August 28, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:05 am
In re David Shokrian M.D., Serial No. 88417120 (February 13, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Cindy B. [read post]