Search for: "In re Doe, b. 11/17/94" Results 41 - 60 of 131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Worker Involved in “Budgetary” Work Following September 11 Attack Did Not Qualify for Recovery Under Article 8-A. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:05 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
Zick (In re Zick), 931 F.2d 1124, 1126 (6th Cir. 1991) ("A bankruptcy court decision to dismiss pursuant to 11 U.S.C. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Their position requires that they be “held to higher standards of integrity and ethical conduct than attorneys or other persons not invested With the public trust”.[89] To ensure that the public does not lose confidence in the judicial system, a delicate balance is required to maintain a degree of judicial insulation from society so that judges remain impartial arbitrators While at the same time allowing them to be active members of the community. [read post]
12 May 2023, 3:00 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
 Copyright that is created during the course of employment is owned by the employer (section 11(2) CDPA 1988). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am by Carolina Attorneys
On appeal, Plaintiff challenges findings of fact 8, 10, 17, 18, 20, 27, 29, 35, and 38. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
R.A.P. 1925(b)) is violated by the losing side’s “preserv[ation of] every unfavorable ruling and contested issue. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 7:10 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The accompanying press release highlights the cooperation of the provincial government with the law society to address these unintended effects, The Ontario government is proactively working with the Law Society of Ontario to establish a program that will ensure the federal government’s Bill C-75 does not restrict paralegals, lawyer licensing candidates or law students from providing legal representation to people charged with summary conviction offences. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, contrary to the Second Circuit, has held that “Item 303 does not create a duty to disclose for purposes of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Sans ratifier comme telle l’importation de cette thèse dans le droit québécois, la Cour, sous la plume de la juge Mailhot, écrit qu’elle ne peut conclure « que l’interprétation factuelle du juge est erronée ni que son interprétation juridique est déraisonnable dans les circonstances actuelles »[33]. [51] Si peu déraisonnable, en effet, que tout récemment, et de manière plus… [read post]