Search for: "In re Doe"
Results 81 - 100
of 106,619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 6:57 pm
Here is a note from the forthcoming edition of Ames, Chafee, and Re on Remedies, my casebook with Emily Sherwin: NOTE ON GOVERNMENT PLAINTIFFS IN EQUITY Does it matter that the plaintiff is the government? [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:30 pm
She does a very good job of exploring the interplay between the various statutory provisions here, some of which were added by the Legislature and others of which were added by the electorate Proposition 139. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:04 pm
Stafford, 226 F.3d 275 (3d Cir. 2000); In re NVIDIA Sec. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm
For example, in In re GoHealth, Inc. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:22 am
California lawmakers take DUI violations seriously, and the law is clear on what does and doesn’t constitute an open container. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:15 am
Why does the BoE worry about this issue? [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:07 am
Here’s a list of key information types to learn about people in your network, along with reasons why they’re useful and strategies for leveraging this information to strengthen your relationships: Professional Background Why Useful: Understanding someone’s professional journey, including their current role, past experiences, and future aspirations, helps you appreciate their skills, experiences, and goals. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
Defendant knows what he is doing, and everyone else does too. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:30 am
” The new manual does yeoman’s work toward simplification, and therefore readability, that practitioners and opinion readers (us included) will doubtless applaud. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 8:15 am
Yes, he does: "It means you pretend to be telling the truth when you’re not. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 7:00 am
What is an Offer in Compromise and How Does It Work in Corona, CA? [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
” This may be why we’re seeing a recent embrace in books and movies of what the sociologist Dana R. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
In Deutschland ist die Zuständigkeit zwischen Bund und einzelnen Bundesländern aufgeteilt.Die erwähnte Haltung betont der EDSA auch auf seiner Website über die Meldung von Datenschutz-Verletzungen: «Where a data controller does not have a main establishment in the EEA, the one-stop-shop mechanism does not apply. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:26 am
You’re stunned at the sheer volume of documents that people submit in a lawsuit and want to learn that sometimes there are even more documents.You care what unrelated people to a dispute have to say about who should win.Your organization wants to spend legal fees on a case they’re not in.Image credit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friends#/media/File:Matt_LeBlanc,_Arqiva_British_Academy_Television_Awards,_2013.jpg Who Files Amicus BriefsMany amicus briefs… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
" … The Bail Project's act of paying cash bail does not inherently express any message. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
The House re-committed House Bill 181 to the Rules Committee on June 6, 2023. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:54 am
What does that mean? [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
Case Commented On: KMN v SZM, 2024 BCCA 70 (CanLII), overturning 2023 BCSC 940 (CanLII) We have both written previously on myths and stereotypes about intimate partner violence (IPV), one of the most common of which is that women make false or exaggerated claims of violence to gain an advantage in family law disputes (see here and here). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:06 am
Just a Kat basking in the glow of trade mark law...CommentIt is clear that it is in the interest of successful opponents of EUTM applications, who are likely to have invested significant resources in their oppositions, to ensure that the refusal grounds identified by the EUIPO are not circumvented through the conversion process, meaning that the resulting national applications need to be re-opposed afresh in each Member State. [read post]
