Search for: "In re Eadie"
Results 1 - 20
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2011, 6:00 am
It has recently been re-emphasised by the Court in Strasbourg that the reporting of “tawdry allegations about an individual’s private life” does not attract the robust protection under Article 10 afforded to more serious journalism. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:38 am
They interlink because they’re both part of the human personality — or, as they tend to call it in Strasbourg, human integrity. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 1:25 am
They interlink because they’re both part of the human personality — or, as they tend to call it in Strasbourg, human integrity. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 1:30 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Quest Advisors Limited Sharriba Ltd v McFeely & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1517 (09 December 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Green v Eadie & Ors [2011] EWHC B24 (Ch) (18 November 2011) Bezier Acquisitions Ltd, Re [2011] EWHC 3299 (Ch) (12 December 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Cooper & Anor v Turrell [2011] EWHC 3269 (QB) (12 December 2011) High Court (Commercial Court) Five Oceans Salvage Ltd v Wenzhou Timber… [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:25 am
Eady is sometimes painted as the architect of a “privacy law through the backdoor”. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:33 am
Eady J was right. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 1:35 pm
" *** Mosley judgment Podcast Podcast 75: Â Carl Gardner of Head of Legal blog on the Eady J Mosley judgment et al… The in medias res bit prompted prolific housing law blogger, Nearly Legal, to remark on Twitter last night "Congrats to Justice Eady for the campest line incorporating legal latin ever. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am
Universal character re nationality and territorial scope. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
‘A lot’, the press would answer” – these were the memorable words of Lord Rodger in the Supreme Court in In re Guardian News and Media Ltd [2010] UKSC 1 [63]. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 8:53 am
When Gentoo took the housing stock, they did so in the knowledge that it was in substantial need of re-development and the price paid for the stock reflected that. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 4:04 pm
Eady J. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 5:50 pm
This recommendation was not adopted, although some years later in Vassiliev v Frank Cass & Co Ltd [2003] EWHC 1428 (QB); [2003] EMLR 33 Eady J ruled that the publication at issue – an article in a journal called Intelligence and National Security, “a specialist publication with a specialist readership who subscribe to it”, with about 146 subscribers in the UK – attracted qualified privilege at common law because it consisted of a “specialist subject… [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am
” 14.24: James Eadie QC notes that the royal prerogative is a freestanding source of power. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am
” Eady J went on to pont out that in the years since Campbell and Re S were decided, “the law has been loyally applied by the courts in a wide variety of circumstances and exhaustively explained in numerous appellate judgments. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm
This process is best illuminated by the four propositions that Lord Steyn identified in Re S ([2005] 1 AC 593 [17]): “First, neither article [8 or 10] has as such precedence over the other. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 9:26 am
Not Justice Eady. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 5:17 am
When you’re wounded and left on Afghanistan’s plains, And the women come out to cut up what remains, Jest roll to your rifle and blow out your brains An’ go to your Gawd like a soldier. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 11:30 am
When you’re trying to read tea leaves from the docket, any petition that presents three questions (as Eady does) causes an involuntary shudder. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:52 pm
In each of Re British Broadcasting Corporation ([2010] 1 AC 145 at [27], [70]), Re Guardian News and Media Limited [2010] 2 WLR 325 at [74] and Independent News and Media Limited and Others v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:21 am
The self-employed graphic designer said he has no money, assets, or work at the moment, but Mr Justice Eady said this was “not relevant” when considering a damages award. [read post]
