Search for: "In re Earl L." Results 61 - 80 of 105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2016, 1:13 pm by Giles Peaker
The origin of the adverb was in a judgment of Rix LJ in McHale v Earl Cadogan [2010] EWCA Civ 14, [2010] 1 EGLR 51, para 17. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 1:06 pm by Phil Dixon
The dissenting justices believed that the majority improperly re-weighed the evidence on appeal and would have found that Rule 803(4) issues were subject to abuse of discretion review, rather than the de novo review applied by the majority. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:55 pm by Law Lady
STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. 1st District.Criminal law -- Counsel -- Waiver -- Failure to conduct proper Faretta inquiry at sentencing hearing -- Remand for resentencing following proper inquiryWILLIAM EARL DUNCAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
Salkin Law of the Land American M Michael Carroll Carrollogos American M Kenneth Anderson Opinio Jurist; LawFare;  Volokh Conspiracy American F Amanda Frost SCOTUS Blog American M Darren L. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Robert Post,  The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024).Laura KalmanI’ve never thought him a great President, but I’ve always had a soft spot for William Howard Taft. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 5:34 am
A few GBs of materia,l regardless of percentage?) [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:13 am by Jim Baker, Sarah Grant
President Nixon and other White House personnel also had contacts with other Justice Department officials, such as Attorney General Kleindienst and Acting FBI Director L. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Lash does include two small pieces of subsequent-interpretation debate: the 1869 effort by a few important Republicans to secure nationwide black voting under the Fourteenth Amendment, and the 1870 re-adoption and partial extension to non-citizens of the Civil Rights Act of 1866. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:34 am by Ronald Collins
 The Chief Justice has already surpassed the number of such opinions authored by his predecessors Chief Justices Earl Warren (six opinions) and Fred Vinson (five opinions). [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:11 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers
There was no principle of interpretation which entitled a court to re-write a contractual provision simply because the factor which the parties catered for did not seem to be developing in the way in which the parties expected. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Most everyday citizens won’t encounter the Commonwealth Court unless they’re suing the government or if they’re appealing a workers’ compensation or unemployment decision. [read post]