Search for: "In re Elias V." Results 1 - 20 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2014, 3:24 pm
 But just in case anyone else was thinking about cutting back, Justice Elia publishes the opinion. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 10:15 am by Layla Kuhl
The Court remanded In re Parole of Michelle Elias and People v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:51 pm by assoulineberlowe
Full fascinating opinion pulled on Westlaw from today below:VICTOR ELIAS PHOTOGRAPHY, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
., PLLC v D'Elia ; 2011 NY Slip Op 21160 ; Appellate Term, Second Department attorney (plaintiff) has sued client (defendant) for fees, while at the same time attorney (defendant) is being sued for legal malpractice in Supreme Court by Client (plaintiff.) [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
., PLLC v D'Elia ; 2011 NY Slip Op 21160 ; Decided on April 26, 2011 ; Appellate Term, Second Department  attorney (plaintiff) has sued client (defendant) for fees, while at the same time attorney (defendant) is being sued for legal malpractice in Supreme Court by Client (plaintiff.) [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:43 am by INFORRM
  First, the Court of Appeal (Pill and Elias LJJ and Sharp J) handed down judgment in the case of Ashcroft v Foley ([2012] EWCA Civ 423). [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:52 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
The other time was in 2000; that election was resolved via the SCOTUS decison in Bush v Gore.All of this has us over here at the Law Blogger re-examining the indirect method by which we select our president through the electoral college.The electoral college is rooted in Article II of the United States Constitution, as fine-tuned by the Twelfth Amendment. [read post]
22 May 2012, 4:28 pm by Martin Downs
Unsurprisingly, the Trust was then was confronted with the problem that he required re-skilling. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:57 am
 As the Court of Appeal judgement delivered by Lord Justice Floyd (Lord Justice Elias and Lord Justice Kitchin concurring) memorably observed:Genentech now recognises, however, that there is no realistic prospect of this court re-visiting the judge's conclusion that a dosing regimen of 8 + 7.14 q3w was obvious. [read post]