Search for: "In re Estate of Cote"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
In Re Cote D’Azur Estate, C.A. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 9:52 pm
Cote? [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 10:41 pm
SDNY: Stern concerns aside, withdrawal at this pre-trial stage would cause significant inefficiencies & be inapprop. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/LYONDELL-DC-SD-NY-COTE-3-29-12.pdf … SDNY: No room in Stern for fr tsf claim that is a private right in 7th Am context but a public right in Art III context http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/LYONDELL-DC-SD-NY-COTE-3-29-12.pdf … SDNY consensus post-Stern… [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 11:09 am
Thus the opinion of Judge Cote has little direct relevance to the larger issue of how copyright law and antitrust should interrelate, at least in the absence of of an industry-wide licensing venture. [read post]
15 May 2020, 2:01 am
Well, in every case I’d treated real estate as a way to shape culture and had partnered with the head of real estate in those efforts. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 7:52 am
Portugal If you’re looking for charm, pristine beaches and a lively metropolitan capital, look no further than Portugal . [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 1:17 pm
" The crystal blue waters of the Cote d' Azur shimmer in the distance. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 8:04 am
Derek Cottier, a Schwartz Cooper real estate partner who served as the firm's lead negotiator on the merger, says all seven members of Schwartz Coooper's executive committee will join Dykema. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
" The appellate court said that as it stood, Cox wasn't entitled to rely on safe harbor because it did very little (if anything) even when told about repeat offenders, re-affirming the jury decision that sided with BMG and awarded $25 million against Cox when they found the broadband carrier liable for piracy by its subscribers, even if over turning that decision. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
Elsewhere, the Court of Justice of the European Union has defined, re-defined and refined its own and (perhaps) our understanding of what the right of 'communication to the public' under Article 3(1) of the InfoSoc Directive actually is. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners: PharmaStem … [read post]
