Search for: "In re Estrada"
Results 1 - 20
of 126
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2010, 2:50 pm
They're on the Internet. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 5:48 am
Estrada, supra. [read post]
20 May 2011, 8:46 am
Maybe they’re right. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:42 am
We're not prepared for it, we're not trained for it, and we shouldn't be doing federal work. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:47 am
[Officer Estrada]: Let me finish. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 4:26 pm
After that initial tap, and before a re-up, Brockus gave information regarding a homicide: that interview wasn’t reported in the wiretap re-up at *3. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:57 pm
Emérito Estrada-Rivera, 722 F.3d 50 In re Rivera, 494 B.R. 101 (BAP 1st Cir. 2013) Panel 2 – Key Mainland Decisions Additional Reference Materials Castleton Plaza, LP, 707 F.3d 821 (7th Cir. 2013) Wooley v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:06 am
Estrada, Defendant Rudy Estrada pled guilty to illegal re-entry after being deported subsequent to an aggravated felony conviction. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:51 pm
Bush re-nominated one of Clinton's failed appellate nominees (Roger Gregory), over the objections of Republican Senators. [read post]
29 Sep 2004, 12:28 pm
Cordoza-Estrada, No. 03-2666 (1st Cir. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 10:17 am
In re: Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products Marketing, Sales Practices & Liability Litig., 903 F.3d 278 (3d Cir. 2018)Plaintiff Estrada alleged that perineal use of Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder can lead to an increased risk of developing ovarian cancer. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:46 pm
District court judges -- since they're solo -- will not have "coalition" problems. [read post]
7 May 2023, 2:37 pm
In the Supreme Court of California, Miguel Angel Estrada, Petitioner, v.The Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, Respondent; The People, Real Party in Interest. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 10:22 am
More fun, of course, since it's (1) an actual trial, and (2) you're working with people instead of boxes. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:22 am
He argues that, under the Act, the theft he committed is now a misdemeanor and that, under the holding in In re Estrada (1965) 63 Cal.2d 740, 744–745 (Estrada), he is entitled to the benefit of that reduction. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:54 pm
" With the latest renaming, are we going to insist on using the honored figure's full name -- even his middle name (Estrada) or initial? [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 1:54 pm
(In re Estrada (1965) 63 Cal.2d 740, 48 Cal.Rptr. 172, 408 P.2d 948 (Estrada) applies to cases when a defendant is placed on probation with a suspended sentence that may be appealed if probation is revoked. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:11 am
Estrada as a panelist and Senior D.C. [read post]
31 May 2015, 5:11 pm
“Evolving” is a good description – since the 2008 Estrada-Espinozaen banc decision, the Ninth (with some welcome guidance from the Supremes in Descamps) has defined and redefined this particularly tricky offense. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:37 pm
Estrada (2d Cir. 2005). [read post]
