Search for: "In re Eugene R. (1980)" Results 21 - 40 of 73
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2017, 5:12 am by Eugene Volokh
Citizens for a Better Env’t, 444 U.S. 620, 632 (1980); Sec’y of State of Md. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 1:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
(That, I take it, was the reason that then-candidate Donald Trump’s “Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing; I think you will be rewarded by our press” likely wasn’t seen as a punishable solicitation.) [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 12:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
” And based on this, the district judge in the case we’re discussing likewise concluded that sex-specific dress codes normally violate Title VII, and that it would normally be illegal for Harris to fire Stephens for insisting on wearing clothing that Harris saw as not male-appropriate. 2. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
A very helpful and interesting paper by my colleague Sam Bray — one of the nation’s top remedies scholars — which he kindly agreed to let me pass along (also available in PDF here): equity, n. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:31 am by Eugene Volokh
A Pennsylvania trial court issued an injunction — now on appeal — ordering Hartzell to stop saying that, “[r]egardless of the truth or falsity of this information. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 2:50 pm
Judge Alex Kozinski -- for whom I clerked 20 years ago, who is one of our nation's most prominent appellate judges and who has long been seen as on balance a libertarianish conservative (appointed by President Reagan) -- has recently published an article in the Georgetown Law Journal that says some pretty harsh things about our criminal justice system, and offers some (doubtless controversial) proposals for improving it. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:08 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 297 N.W.2d 252, 258 (Minn. 1980); Dadd v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
If you’re interested, you can find the briefs here, but let me quote my students’ and my amicus brief in the case, filed through the UCLA Scott & Cyan Banister First Amendment Clinic, on behalf of Profs. [read post]
29 May 2015, 6:45 am
” I sympathize with the Metro officials; they have responsibilities to their passengers, and their employees, and they’re trying to keep them safe. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
Then the movement became bipartisan, as Congress tried to re-enact a broad presumptive exemption regime with RFRA and RLUIPA. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
. * * * Since we’re on this topic, let me mention a related claim that I’ve heard from some academics: that, at least in the 1960s to 1980s, “only Christians ever [won] free exercise cases” in the U.S. [read post]