Search for: "In re Faith B." Results 21 - 40 of 2,218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2019, 4:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  Judge Conner initially noted in his Opinion that Motions to Sever re governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21 and that Motions to Bifurcate are governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(b). [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 4:16 am by Nedim Malovic
The same year, the applicant, Full Colour, filed a request for a declaration of invalidity for all relevant goods and services on grounds of bad faith under Article 59(1)(b) EUTMR and also pursuant to Article 59(1)(a) EUTMR in connection with Article 7(1)(b) and (c) EUTMR.The parties’ argumentsThe applicant submitted, amongst other things, that the mark for which protection was obtained was identical to EUTM No 12 575 155 (that is: the registration at issue in the… [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 5:15 am
This forced an analysis under the duty of loyalty and whether the directors aced in good faith. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 7:52 am
In June 2006 the court, in In re The Walt Disney Company Derivative Litigation (New Developments discussion here), defined bad faith, and by implication good faith. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:16 pm
Intercargo Corp., 768 A.2d 492 (Del.Ch.2000); In re Lukens Inc. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 12:39 pm
October 18, 2007)(Schneider, J.) dismissed the debtor's chapter 7 case as an "abuse" under section 707(b)(1) based on the "totality of the circumstances" test of section 707(b)(3). [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:20 pm
The court stated, “[i]ndeed, §102(b)(7) on its face seems to equate bad faith with intentional misconduct” and cites to section 102(b)(7)(ii). [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:20 pm
The court stated, “[i]ndeed, §102(b)(7) on its face seems to equate bad faith with intentional misconduct” and cites to section 102(b)(7)(ii). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:13 am by David J. DePaolo
Texas has been generating a lot of workers' compensation bad faith law lately.A couple of weeks ago the state's Supreme Court essentially put the lid on bad faith arising out of workers' compensation claims with its Ruttiger opinion.Now the same court ruled that there is no attorney-client privilege applicable to communications between an insurer's lawyer and the employer.In Re XL Specialty Insurance Co., 10-0969, 06/29/2012 involved Jerome Wagner who… [read post]