Search for: "In re Faith B."
Results 41 - 60
of 2,218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2011, 2:16 am
Some panelists have argued that the UDRP should be construed to eliminate the “and” where bad faith use is found under paragraph 4(b)(iv) of the Policy. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 2:15 pm
In re Henebury, 361 B.R. at 611. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:55 pm
Against this backdrop, a recent Delaware Court of Chancery opinion evaluating an implied covenant claim (and other contract-based claims) through the forgiving lens of a Rule 12(b)(6) challenge, In re CVR Refining, LP Unitholder Litigation, C.A. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
The issue came up in In re Bristol Myers Squibb Co. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 12:46 pm
In re Henebury, 361 B.R. at 611. [read post]
20 Feb 2006, 1:33 pm
In last week's posts on termination and extension of the automatic stay under 362(c)(3) and (4), Part I discussed notice and procedure issues, and Part II discussed how one court in In re Charles, 334 B.R. 207, approached the burdens of proof for invoking the presumptive lack of good faith for purposes of 362(c)(3)(B). [read post]
17 Sep 2022, 4:38 pm
In a recent case, Re Zaleschuk, 2022 BCSC 943, Justice A. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:40 pm
[2] In re Huckfeldt), 39 F.3d 829, 832 (8th Cir. 1994) [3] In re Zick, 931 F.2d 1124, 1129 (6th Cir. 1991) [4] Perlin v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 12:15 pm
In re Lear Corp. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:01 pm
In re Novell, Inc. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 6:00 am
Directors are also protected if a company’s charter contains protections under Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) and a plaintiff cannot allege that a majority of the directors acted disloyally or in bad faith. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 6:48 am
As a result, it concluded that the trade mark should be declared invalid under Article 59(1)(b). [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 6:32 am
Richter, Steven Epstein, and Scott B. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 10:40 pm
See In re American Intern. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
In re Zick, 931 F.2d 1124, 1129 (6th Cir.1991). [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:19 am
"] In re Real-Time Marketing, Ltd., Serial No. 88590001 (August 24, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
See FRCP 6(b)(1) and TBMP Section 509. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 2:45 pm
But still talks about the goodwill P has built up, when generic terms maybe shouldn’t have goodwill b/c they’re not marks. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 2:37 am
“In particular, the Panel in [Camon] looked at recent decisions which found that the wording of paragraph 4(b)(iv) of the Policy is such that it is not necessary to prove registration and use in bad faith, and that the type of use described in this paragraph is to be taken as evidence of bad faith registration as well as bad faith use. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 10:11 am
Chainoglou and B. [read post]
