Search for: "In re G.S." Results 1 - 20 of 292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2020, 11:20 am by Jonathan Holbrook
This wasn’t a “parade” or “demonstration” — we’re just people walking around exercising our rights. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:22 am by Jacquelyn Greene
The holding of In re E.M. was reaffirmed by three more published decisions:  In re E.A., 267 N.C.App. 396 (2019), In re A.L.B., 849 S.E.2d. 352 (2020), and In re K.M., 854 S.E.2d 453 (2021). [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:41 pm by Jamie Markham
In my previous post I wrote about In re Hamilton, a recent appellate case involving petitions to terminate sex offender registration. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:39 am by Jacquelyn Greene
In re Rikard, 161 N.C.App. 150 (2003),  In re J.F., 237 N.C.App. 218 (2014), In re D.A.H., 277 N.C.App. 16 (2021). [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:00 am
’s state court claims (predicated on such theories as  “res judicata” and “collateral estoppel"). [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:00 am
’s claims (predicated on “res judicata” and “collateral estoppel” grounds). [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:07 pm by Shea Denning
G.S. 20-139.1(b5) addresses subsequent testing in DWI cases generally, requiring that a suspect be re-advised of his implied consent rights before being requested to submit to a subsequent chemical analysis under the implied consent procedures. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:03 pm by Jamie Markham
” In other words, when you’re already serving time, you don’t accrue jail credit toward anything else. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:40 am by M. Jeanette Pitts
We’re gearing up to do that—if you’re interested, let us know. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:08 am by Jessica Smith
This session law re-codified G.S. 14-27.7(b) as G.S. 14-27.32 and broke it into subsections. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 4:48 pm by Jamie Markham
Further complicating things (and we’re not even out of Article 7B yet) is the recently enacted crime of sexual contact or penetration under pretext of medical treatment under G.S. 14-27.33A. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 7:11 am by John Rubin
When Dockery saw the gun, he said, “[Y]ou’re going to need more than that P shooter, motherf—er, I’ve been shot before. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 1:44 pm by Shea Denning
In re Superior Court Order, 315 N.C. 378 (1986) (applying standard to disclosure of bank records); In re Brooks, 143 N.C. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:08 am by Jessica Smith
This session law re-codified G.S. 14-27.7(b) as G.S. 14-27.32 and broke it into subsections. [read post]