Search for: "In re Garcia on Admission" Results 41 - 60 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the following cases for the upcoming term. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
United States, 16-9187, and Villareal-Garcia v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am by cdw
” In re Tyrone Noling, 2011 U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 3:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Q re: role of error: seems like you’re doubling down on a particular view of what works do when they communicate—that the author has a message and can transmit it in a way that doesn’t have errors if properly transmitted. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  In light several key court of appeals decisions prior to Dukes (including the Second Circuit in In re IPO Securities Litigation, the Third Circuit in In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation, and even the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Dukes itself), this analytical model is not groundbreaking, but Dukes puts an end to any possible reluctance by the federal courts to resolve an issue of fact simply because it might overlap with the merits. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Williams, No. 06-3620 Conviction for armed robbery and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence is affirmed where the district judge did not err in ruling that the testimony of eyewitnesses would be admissible at trial since a lineup in which the eyewitnesses identified the defendant was not flawed in any way that would lead to irreparable misidentification. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
Lafferty, No. 06-1901In a prosecution for offenses arising from a burglary, denial of defendant's motion to suppress statements she and an alleged confederate made during a custodial interrogation is reversed as: 1) police failed to scrupulously respect her demand to remain silent by putting her in an interrogation room with her alleged confederate after she had invoked her right to remain silent and after he promised to give a confession; 2) no valid and meaningful waiver of her rights… [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Garcia, the statute of limitations apply with equal force to section 1983 method-of-execution action; 2) the limitations period begins to accrue on the date direct review of a plaintiff's conviction and sentence is complete; 3) the district court correctly found that the statute of limitations has run for each of the three remaining plaintiffs; and 4) there was no reason to hold that the statute of limitations has been tolled. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Mowatt, No. 06-4886 "Conviction for drug and weapons offenses is reversed and remanded where: 1) requiring defendant to open the door to his apartment constituted a warrantless search; 2) no exigent circumstances justified the officers' demand that defendant open his apartment door; and 3) the evidence seized pursuant to the search warrant that the officers eventually obtained was not admissible under the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 11:00 am
(Subscribe first, then RSVP for free admission). [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
  So far many plaintiffs have had trouble coming up with factual support to back such allegations – and sometimes we’re not even sure why they’re making them. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Garcia-Alvarez, No. 071471, 071697 Conviction for carjacking and firearms offenses is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence proffered against defendant was not sufficient; and 2) the district court erred in denying defendant's motion for a new trial. [read post]
11 May 2018, 12:13 am by Jon Ibanez
Breathalyzers should be re-calibrated every year, but the state’s configuration limits those adjustments only to the first six months, the report added. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Upton, No. 07-1456 Conviction and sentence on drug and weapons charges are affirmed over defendant's challenges to: 1) the voluntariness of his Miranda waiver; 2) the admission of a police officer's expert and lay testimony; 3) the district court's denial of certain jury instructions; and 4) his status as an Armed Career Criminal. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
 One swarm may last for months up to well over a year, depending on the popularity of the work, and people may leave and re-enter the same swarm at any time. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Garcia, No. 07-40245 A conviction for drug-related offenses is reversed and remanded for a new trial where: 1) during rebuttal closing argument, the government improperly bolstered its key witnesses, the agents who heard defendant's unrecorded confession; and 2) such bolstering constituted reversible plain error, which seriously affected the fairness, integrity, and public reputation of the proceedings. [read post]