Search for: "In re Google Play Consumer Antitrust Litigation" Results 1 - 20 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2023, 6:38 am by Yolanda J. Bromfield
Judge Donato’s scathing opinion in In re Google Play Consumer Antitrust Litigation represents yet another cautionary tale for attorneys certifying that a client has taken appropriate steps to preserve all pertinent electronic discovery without providing meaningful oversight. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:38 am by Yolanda J. Bromfield
Judge Donato’s scathing opinion in In re Google Play Consumer Antitrust Litigation represents yet another cautionary tale for attorneys certifying that a client has taken appropriate steps to preserve all pertinent electronic discovery without providing meaningful oversight. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:38 am by Yolanda J. Bromfield
Judge Donato’s scathing opinion in In re Google Play Consumer Antitrust Litigation represents yet another cautionary tale for attorneys certifying that a client has taken appropriate steps to preserve all pertinent electronic discovery without providing meaningful oversight. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:33 am by Florian Mueller
"Remember, remember, the 5th 6th of November" (and the 12th of September):Judge James Donato of the United States District has formally approved a case schedule negotiated between Google and the Google Play Store antitrust plaintiffs (three dozen U.S. states, Epic Games, Match Group, and a consumer class action) and set the In Re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (case no. 3:22-cv-2746-JD, N.D. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 10:47 am by Barry Barnett
The AAI and the economists seek to support of opinion evidence in antitrust litigation against Google, In re Google Play Store Antitrust Litig., No. 3:21-md-02981-JD (N.D. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 10:47 am by Barry Barnett
AAI and the economists seek to support opinion evidence in antitrust litigation against Google, In re Google Play Store Antitrust Litig., No. 3:21-md-02981-JD (N.D. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 2:29 am by Florian Mueller
Yesterday, Judge James Donato of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, who is presiding over multiple consolidated Google Play Store antitrust cases (brought by Epic Games, three dozen state AGs, Match Group, and class-action plaintiffs), entered his findings of fact and conclusions of law, ordering monetary sanctions first (recovery of attorneys' fees) and announcing that non-monetary sanctions will be determined a little later:In… [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:03 am by Florian Mueller
Apple: The Pepper case (official caption: In Re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation) in the Northern District of California was filed in 2011. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:29 pm by Florian Mueller
First, the notice of a tentative settlement (this post continues below the document): In Re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation: Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Deadlines in Consumers' and States' Actions in Light of Tentative Settlement It is not surprising that the class-action lawyers would settle with Google: in the end they just want to get paid. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 1:21 am by Florian Mueller
Late on Monday, the plaintiffs (36 state AGs, Epic Games, Match Group, and consumer class-action plaintiffs) and Google submitted a joint proposed schedule that would allow their antitrust litigation in the Northern District of California to go to trial in the fourth quarter:In Re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (case no. 3:21-md-02981-JD, N.D. cal.): Joint Statement Re: Proposed Case Schedule and Trial… [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 11:16 pm by Florian Mueller
Google (in the District of Columbia) and In Re Google Play Antitrust Litigation (Northern District of California) being two highly interdependent cases--with some of the interdependencies being more than just procedural in nature. [read post]
The largest antitrust case of the last quarter century has been playing out in federal district court in Washington D.C. since mid-September. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:12 am by Florian Mueller
Coincidentally, today is the cutoff date for fact discovery in two disparate antitrust actions involving Activision Blizzard King (ABK): the FTC's adjudicative proceeding (in-house lawsuit) over ABK's acquisition by Microsoft, andthe In Re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation in the Northern District of California, where Epic Games and Match Group are pursuing a per se violation claim against Google based on its "Project… [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 12:59 am by Florian Mueller
Cal.): Plaintiffs' Responses to Minute Order QuestionsIn Re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation (case no. 3:21-md-2981-JD, N.D. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 8:35 am by Dan Lopez
Antitrust has always mattered to consumers and businesses, and to antitrust lawyers and economists, but today it also is in the political and public discourse more than ever. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 10:32 am by Dan Lopez
Antitrust has always mattered to consumers and businesses, but today it is also in the public discourse more than ever. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:33 am by Neil Rosenbaum
Last week, in In re Google Adwords Litigation, a federal judge in California issued a decision on class certification in a lawsuit brought by businesses that had placed ads through Google. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:41 am by Dan Lopez
He leads Oxera’s work in the digital arena, his advises high profile clients such as Amazon, Google, and Microsoft. [read post]