Search for: "In re Hawkins, Petitioner" Results 21 - 30 of 30
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2010, 10:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
Here’s the Statement from the start of the motion (with most citations omitted), which summarizes the argument, though please read the whole thing if you’re interested in the issue: On November 28, 2010, this Court identified Circuit Judges Reinhardt, Hawkins, and N.R. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Vasbinder, No. 06-2381 Grant of a habeas petition challenging a conviction and sentence for first-degree murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony is reversed as petitioner did not satisfy the gateway requirements for excusing a time-barred claim. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Attorney Gen. of the US, No. 07-1799 Petition for review of a BIA order of removability is denied where petitioner's conviction for indecent assault under 18 Pa. [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 7:39 am by Russell Knight
If it’s not your divorce and you’re married to someone else, that alimony should have been cancelled by the new marriage. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Both this week’s winners of golden tickets are one-time relists: Hawkins v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
Also returning for a fifth time is the petition for rehearing in Hawkins v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
§ 2255 petition where a petitioner relies to his detriment on binding circuit precedent that would have rendered his claim futile. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Peters, No. 05-6101 "A sentence imposed on remand for offenses arising out of a tax fraud scheme is reversed and remanded for re-sentencing where the district court's failure to address defendant's "time-served" argument did not satisfy the "procedural reasonableness" requirement required by Supreme Court precedent. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
Rueda argues that because the unsigned opinion of Judge Davidson was his first decision, he could not re-determine the merits in a subsequently signed decision. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
Or if you’re teaching an advanced criminal law class, you might want to have your students buy chapter 8, which covers the modern criminal law of gun control, particularly under the federal Gun Control Act.Summary of Contents ContentsPrefaceAcknowledgementsEditorial Note PART ONETHE ORIGINS OF THE RIGHT TO ARMS Chapter 1. [read post]