Search for: "In re Hawley" Results 141 - 160 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2021, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley will take place behind closed doors by one of the most secretive committees in Congress. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:41 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  The public needs to trust us that we’re doing research or teaching or other educational activities without being pressured to take certain positions. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
 But I did not intend to write a book about conservative extremists in this period (for that, see George Hawley’s Right-Wing Critics of American Conservatism (University Press of Kansas, 2016) and Making Sense of the Alt-Right (Columbia University Press, 2017). [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Josh Hawley, or some other demagogue, these judges will be first in line for a promotion.Just this afternoon, I happened upon a fantastic column by Joe Patrice that was published a week ago on Above the Law. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:23 pm by Rob Robinson
Hawley Postscript: Bad Facts Don’t Help on Appeal - http://tinyurl.com/4xl8hdb (John Tredennick) Recovering eDiscovery Costs as a Prevailing Party - http://tinyurl.com/3oxuc6v (Christine Soares) Riding the Waves of Early Case Assessment - http://tinyurl.com/67zu9x4 (George Rudoy) Safe Harbor: Why EU Data Needs 'Protecting' from US Law - http://tinyurl.com/43r27gf (Zack Whittaker) Should Government Agencies Be Able To Exempt Themselves From The Privacy Act? [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Two days ago, all but five of the fifty sitting Republican United States Senators voted to dismiss the House’s second impeachment of Donald Trump, relying on the nakedly dishonest argument that the Constitution does not allow former federal officials to be impeached and tried by Congress. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:29 am by Peter Mahler
Bear in mind, however, that the governing rules, whether statutory or judge-made, can vary significantly from state to state, so whether you’re a business owner or a lawyer representing one, be sure to consult the rules in your jurisdiction. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
” As a logical matter, because we cannot re-run history to see what might have turned out differently, we can never know with certainty that we actually were on the precipice of disaster.But what we saw in late 2020 and early 2021 is best analogized to an automobile with iffy brakes careening down a winding canyon road, accelerating as the car tilts up onto two wheels, with death averted only through luck and just-in-time steering away from disaster. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 6:07 pm by INFORRM
John, Professor of History and Communications (Columbia University); Michael Schudson, Professor of Journalism and (affiliated faculty) Sociology (Columbia University); and Hawley Johnson, Associate Director, Columbia Global Freedom of Expression. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 7:32 am by Ronald Collins
But in the end, all the “reform” discussion boils down to re-arranging deck chairs on the Titanic, which isn’t the appointment process, but the ship of state. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:55 am by Bob Ambrogi
— Kelli Proia (@lawducate) November 10, 2019 If you're not competent in the law, you're committing malpractice, regardless of your tech competency. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 11:39 pm by Carter Ruml
  (Except when they’re seeking $700 billion in emergency TARP funding.) [read post]
29 Dec 2007, 3:02 am
For instance, the Rigsby’s were represented by Gregory Hawley and Katherine Brown at their April 30-May 1, 2007 depositions, but Richard Scruggs frequently objected and instructed them not to answer questions on grounds of work product and attorney-client privilege. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 7:22 am by William Ford, Rohini Kurup
Over the past two months, Congress has convened a series of hearings on the failures that enabled the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Hawley, No. 06-50510 A conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm is affirmed over challenges to the district court's admission of certain evidence and application of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). [read post]