Search for: "In re Head (1986)" Results 1 - 20 of 420
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by Evelyn Tsisin
’ You’re about to find out just how much you were right about that. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1]  Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3]  One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
” She emphasized that Congress removed the text referring to gratuities from Section 666 in the 1986 amendment. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:45 am by Hon. Andy Levin
After Jean-Claude (“Baby Doc”) Duvalier fled Haiti in 1986, a wonderfully boisterous civil society began to take shape. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:01 pm by Joshua Smeltzer
    [1] As used herein “Section” means a section of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Indeed, the only thing that has may be emerging with any degree of clarity may be that the generation-long effort to patch, re-patch, and patch the patches of the tatters of the old Soviet Marxist-Leninist model which was from the first ill transposed to the Spanish Caribbean has produced little more than ever more elegant restatements of objectives that cannot be met constructed out of principles that remained as immovable as Biblical text but which posited a world the reality of which had… [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
As we dive into the new year, we're filled with gratitude, excitement and unwavering determination. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am by centerforartlaw
The criminal gang responsible for this theft sold the Buddha heads to a dealer from Chengdu at $1500, and they then sold them to a buyer from Southeast China for $18,500.[16] It often happens that the stolen work doubles or triples in price each time it is transferred to a new buyer. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 8:12 am
 Pix Credit Museum Panama City, Panama For those who might have an interest, I have posted for comment or reaction, a discussion draft of my essay, Overcoming the Human, Rights, and the State in Human Rights. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 7:25 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Baltzer, 502 NE 2d 459 – Ill: Appellate Court, 2nd Dist. 1986 If you are in an Illinois court and you hear a phrase you do not fully understand, you had better believe the other side fully understands that phrase and is using it for a purpose that does not include your best interests. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm by Guest Author
 We are very familiar with this regulatory regime because we both voted to dissent from the FCC’s 2023 decision to head back down the path of reinstating those regulations.[4] There are several reasons why the FCC’s 2015 net neutrality rules failed First Amendment scrutiny that are not present in this social media context. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:50 am by Brian Finucane
Despite these regular military actions, the Pentagon implausibly claims that “[w]e’re not in an armed conflict with the Houthis. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm by Robert Liles
  This rule was first established in 1986 under Executive Order 12549,[11] titled “Debarment and Suspension. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:55 am by Neil H. Buchanan
-taxpayer-controlled foreign corporation’s “accumulated post-1986 deferred foreign income” as part of the corporation’s taxable income during 2017. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Alexandra Champagne
Thomson Reuters has published the McGill Guide since its first edition in 1986. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
 at 6 (noting that the MQD “flips the normal Chevron analysis on its head”). [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (“SLSC”) has identified a re-attempt by the Government to amend the Public Order Act 1986 to lower the threshold for police intervention in respect of protests that was already rejected in January 2023 in the Public Order Bill—now the Public Order Act 2023. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]