Search for: "In re Head (1986)" Results 21 - 40 of 420
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2012, 4:02 am by Lori Howell
From 1998 to 2008, juvenile arrests dropped by 51 percent there, juvenile detention by 66 percent and re-arrests by 80 percent. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Simon Lewis
That was not the case when I compiled the first Australasian Legal Software Directory in 1986. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 3:25 am
  One in the head, now you’re dead. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:23 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Enacted in 1986, when cellphones were the size of your head, the law has not kept pace with technology and allows the feds to access citizens’ electronic communications under a far lower standard than physical mail, which requires a warrant. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 2:46 pm by NARF
The Supreme Court of Washington's broad interpretation of the "reason to know" standard in In Re Dependency of Z.J.G. and why a uniform, broad interpretation of the standard will lead to better outcomes. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 11:34 am
Many neurological injuries are tough to prove, because they’re usually invisible or easily mistaken for other conditions. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 12:44 am
Burman points out that in 1986, when facing a capital gains tax increase in 1987, stock sales doubled. [read post]
15 May 2009, 6:30 am
Head on over to the Online Drum Set and pound those tubs. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm by Jeff Gamso
  If you buy into our version of the death penalty, that's what you're buying into. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 2:46 pm by Chepenik Trushin LLP
The new law also allows parents to take a $500 credit for each non-child dependent they’re supporting. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 2:46 pm by Chepenik Trushin LLP
The new law also allows parents to take a $500 credit for each non-child dependent they’re supporting. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 7:25 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Baltzer, 502 NE 2d 459 – Ill: Appellate Court, 2nd Dist. 1986 If you are in an Illinois court and you hear a phrase you do not fully understand, you had better believe the other side fully understands that phrase and is using it for a purpose that does not include your best interests. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:00 pm by David Kravets
Leahy, the head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, a year ago made the same proposal to amend the 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:26 pm by Daniel Shaviro
But clearly our revenue needs push in favor of all these ideas, whether they’re good or bad, so we’re likely to hear more about them at some point.Existing taxes – I’m very skeptical about the current desirability of 1986-style tax reform, in which you broaden the base but then give away most or all of the budgetary gain by cutting tax rates. [read post]