Search for: "In re Hubbell"
Results 321 - 340
of 459
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2010, 10:03 am
He went on to serve for 2 more terms before being defeated for re-election in 1994. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:09 am
Some of the best are Martindale Hubbell, Best Lawyers in America and Super Lawyers. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:45 am
We're talking serious ethical issues here with e-chasing, and I wonder who the lucky lawyer will be that becomes the test case. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 9:27 pm
You can let your prospective clients know you're more like them and less like other lawyers. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 9:39 am
Martindale-Hubbell has also honored him with a listing in their Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 5:54 am
You still have time.[4] Martindale-Hubbell will continue to fall into irrelevancy.Martindale was the standard. now they're just trying to remain relevant. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 10:49 am
If you're a small company in the legal space, there's never been a better time to develop new products and solutions to compete with the dualopoly of Thomson West FindLaw and LexisNexis (including LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell). [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 6:42 am
Adoption if you're Madonna... [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:54 pm
Trademark & business lawyer (and spice merchant) Venkat Balasubramani:To the always battling social media cheerleaders and curmudgeonly lawyers: your antics are entertaining, but you're probably both misguided. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:16 am
Whenever you’re ready, you’re welcome to join the rest of us in this century —the sooner, the better. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 11:33 am
We're here for the long haul, and are fully aware that there are no legitimate short cuts. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 7:00 pm
We're not for a minute defending spamming, nor have we ever done so, I'm not sure whether there's a teaching moment in there. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 2:47 pm
[Going Concern] * Martindale-Hubbell apologizes. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 11:45 am
Martindale-Hubbell has apologized for blog spam left on my site, using the comments area of my prior post for that purpose. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:24 am
Turkewitz is spot on in asking lawyers and law firms who use Martindale-Hubbell: How would you rate M-H? [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 10:17 am
Martindale-Hubbell has also honored him with a listing in their Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:30 am
For those of you who might say, I'm just disgruntled because I wasn't included in the list, you're totally wrong. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 9:05 am
Ask them how you're doing. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 2:16 am
But there are some subtle problems that may arise if you're not careful. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:25 pm
In re Carletti, 328 F.2d 1020 (C.C.P.A. 1964); Hueter v. [read post]
