Search for: "In re I.C." Results 41 - 59 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2009, 3:32 am
That [Grandmother] meets the requirements of I.C. 31-9-2-35.5 and is named as Defacto Custodian of [J.V.].2. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
But standard libel law seems to take a different view. [* * *] Here's what Part I.C of my Large Libel Models? [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:16 am by Guido Paola
In such a case, the use feature is a functional process feature comparable in category with the other features (steps) of the process (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 8th edition 2016, I.C.8.1.3 c); T 848/93, point 3.2 of the Reasons). [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:16 am by Guido Paola
In such a case, the use feature is a functional process feature comparable in category with the other features (steps) of the process (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 8th edition 2016, I.C.8.1.3 c); T 848/93, point 3.2 of the Reasons). [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
Of course, you’re not physically being touched, just like you’re not actually one hundred feet off the ground, but it’s still scary as hell. [read post]
14 May 2015, 4:00 am by Paula Bremner
“Furthermore the compounds may be administered orally, thereby obviating the disadvantages associated with i.c. administration” (pp 3-4 of the Patent). [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In his Pensées, Blaise Pascal noted: “On what shall man found the order of the world which he would govern? [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
 December 14, 2022Pendente lite child support award will not be disturbed absent exigent circumstances or failure to consider appropriate factors. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Nor can stating a use that is new and not-obvious render an apparatus which is already known novel and inventive, see also the Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 6th edition 2010, I.C.5.3.3 and the case law cited therein, in particular T 215/84, T 523/89, T 637/92. [3.2.1] The various versions of claim 1 are all directed at a protective case defined by the same physical features: circularly knitted, tubular body, elastic mouth section at one end, closing seam at the other. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 1:09 am by Diane Tweedlie
.- Der Gegenstand des Patents entspreche den Artikeln 52 bis 57 EPÜ, weil nicht nachgewiesen worden sei, dass das Dokument D1a zum Stand der Technik gemäß Artikel 54 (2) EPÜ gehöre. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 11:20 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
The Case Law Book (8th edition, July 2016) provides in section I.C.2.8.5 "Proof of common general knowledge": "Where an assertion that something is common general knowledge is challenged, the person making the assertion must provide proof that the subject-matter in question is in fact common general knowledge (T 438/97, T 329/04, T 941/04, T 690/06). [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 6:24 am by J. Paul Pope
  “Oh sh*t, we’re already giving him the good stuff,” the briefer thought. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
This may be a reason why such mutual pseudonymity is so rare.[12]   [1] In re Sealed Case, 931 F.3d 92, 97 (D.C. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
This may be a reason why such mutual pseudonymity is so rare.[12]   [1] In re Sealed Case, 931 F.3d 92, 97 (D.C. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm by Robin Shea
” [FN] The “light duty” section in the original Guidance (Section I.C.1) has been significantly edited. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am by Hadley Baker, Mikhaila Fogel
” [Vol. 1, p. 67-68] “The LOI [letter of intent], signed by Trump for the Trump Organization and Rozov on behalf of I.C. [read post]