Search for: "In re I.S."
Results 41 - 60
of 15,404
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2010, 6:45 pm
Carter Ruml of KYEstates.com offers up a great summary of the facts and conclusions of the case of In Re Woods. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 4:30 am
After one child was found to be severely malnourished, i.e. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 5:57 pm
Over at IP ADR, we warned against using email to negotiate because the social scientists tell us that it is "profoundly anti-social," i.e., we're less generous when we respond to an offer via email than when we're negotiating face to face. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 4:15 am
Co., 76 NY2d 659, the court explained that the underlying purpose of the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel is to "prevent[] repetitious litigation of disputes which are essentially the same. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:19 pm
If you’re pairing someone else’s music with your moving images (i.e. using someone’s recorded song in your movie), you would most likely need TWO licenses; a sync license, and a [...]I Want to Use Music in My Film. [read post]
Section 230 Doesn’t Protect App Stores That Sell Virtual Chips for Casino Apps–In re Apple App Store
6 Sep 2022, 9:25 am
HP (re the Chubby Checker). [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:26 am
Whether that prior art is first explored by the Patentee or Petitioner (i.e., burden shifting) is of no moment. [read post]
1 May 2019, 11:23 am
Finally, I conclude that law and other legal entities are indeed artefacts broadly speaking, but they are much more than mere artefacts, i.e. complex institutions and institutional practices, comprising different sub-institutions, which require not only recognition, but also (re)evaluation and (re)interpretation, as I suggest by pointing to the forms of government, in general, and to democracy, in particular.Download the article from SSRN at the link. [read post]
1 May 2019, 11:23 am
Finally, I conclude that law and other legal entities are indeed artefacts broadly speaking, but they are much more than mere artefacts, i.e. complex institutions and institutional practices, comprising different sub-institutions, which require not only recognition, but also (re)evaluation and (re)interpretation, as I suggest by pointing to the forms of government, in general, and to democracy, in particular.Download the article from SSRN at the link. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
Plaintiff showed, however, that the ownership of the domain name changed sometime in 2021 (i.e., it was re-registered). [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 4:18 am
Accordingly, said the court, "[t]he [Fair Pay] Act preserves the existing law concerning when a discriminatory pension distribution or payment occurs, i.e., upon retirement, not upon the issuance of each check. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 7:52 am
Fred Wilson has started a fascinating discussion on the relative merits of search (i.e., Google) and social networking to generate quality content. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:57 pm
The reality facing a would-be data intruder (i.e., a person attempting re-identification) is that in addition to frequent errors in online information, people move (and don’t always promptly update their address information); and some segment of any population is simply “off the grid”. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 6:19 am
In re EZCORP Inc. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:03 pm
Ross emphasized that Congress sought to prevent people from “taking the law into their own hands” by re-entering the country and challenging the prior order only upon indictment for re-entry. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 6:53 am
The homeowner obtained a judgment against the mechanical subcontractor which was satisfied (i.e., paid). [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 9:36 pm
In Re: High Voltage Engineering Corporation, No. 07-2589. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 12:04 am
These are mostly common sense (i.e. do your most important studying during the part of the day when you're at your best, eliminate distractions while studying, take breaks, etc.). [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 10:03 am
We're having tapas. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:04 pm
If you're ever looking for a good anecdote about how post-trial motions/appeal can backfire -- i.e., win a new trial, but then the result of the new trial is worse -- this one here today is a pretty good tale. [read post]
