Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 3. OTHERWISE"
Results 41 - 60
of 636
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2023, 5:50 am
” In re Marriage of Sreenan, 81 Ill. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 5:11 am
For instance in, In re Aggrenox Antitrust Litig., No. 3:14-md-02516 (SRU) (D. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 5:17 am
“To be entitled to relief under section 2-1401, the petitioner must affirmatively set forth specific factual allegations supporting each of the following elements: (1) the existence of a meritorious claim or defense; (2) due diligence in presenting that claim or defense in the original action; and (3) due diligence in presenting the section 2-1401 petition. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 7:03 am
The FCC pointed out that LPFM stations are deemed secondary to “drop-in” FM allotments under Section 5(3) of the Local Community Radio Act of 2010. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 3:01 am
However, in Re Peel Cemetery [2021] EC Sodor 2, Re Lambeth Cemetery Tooting [2021] ECC Swk 3, Re St. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 5:26 am
” (Joint Petition at 3.) [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 5:00 pm
” (Joint Petition at 3.) [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 4:12 am
In re Morton-Norwich Prods., Inc., 671 F.2d 1332, 213 USPQ 9, 12-15 (CCPA 1982). [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 5:51 am
Note: The author would like to acknowledge that this article benefited from a Workshop, held on Feb. 3 at the George Washington University Law School, entitled “U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Res. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
§ 256b(d)(3). [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:49 am
Supreme Court could follow the path laid out in an amicus brief by The Cyber Civil Rights Initiative (CCRI). [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
The growth of private markets through exempt offerings, the ascension of the once-mythical “unicorns,” and what these things portend for the future of our public markets have been hotly debated topics for some time now.[1] Over the past decades, private securities offerings have grown at a significantly faster rate than public offerings.[2] Companies that contemplate going public are now waiting much longer to do so.[3] Others are choosing not to go public at all.[4] Companies… [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
The Supreme Court disagreed with the interpretation of the Partnership Agreement by the Court of Chancery and initially focused on the need to read both the Partnership Agreement and the related LLC Agreement together because both agreements described how the general partner managed Boardwalk. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 3:40 pm
X. also initiated criminal proceedings against Y. in Switzerland, and there is a warrant for Y. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 3:28 pm
The further administrative proceedings to deal with the petitioner’s appeal did not re-commence the statutory period to file a CEQA challenge. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
.,2022) the Appellate Divison observed that a person commits harassment in the second degree when that person, “with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person ... strikes, shoves, kicks or otherwise subjects such other person to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the same (Penal Law § 240.26[1]). [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 2:15 am
Mindful of the aspiration of the Church of England generally to achieve carbon neutrality by 2030 [and by 2035 in the Diocese of Southwark], the Petitioners’ initial preference was to replace the boiler with an electric one [3]. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 10:19 am
Roberts is. currently a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Asia Security Initiative and a fellow at the Maureen and Mike Mansfield Center, He is also the author of The Myth of Chinese Capitalism and writes the Trade War newsletter, both of which are superb most-reads. 3. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
Kelley is the former USPTO Solicitor and PTAB Chief Judge. 3. [read post]
